We performed a comparison between NetXMS and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"We have a large network spanning over 1000 kilometers. NetXMS provides visibility and sends alerts. Typically, most monitoring systems monitor every 60 seconds, but NetXMS allows us to adjust this. For critical links, we can set it to check every second. For our high-priority financial customers, we monitor every second. So, every three seconds, we receive another email and a Telegram alert. This helps us meet our SLAs (Service Level Agreements) with our high-priority customers."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"Zabbix is an excellent performance monitoring tool."
"The solution's design has recently changed and it is visually pleasing with more color, for example, there is blue, black, and white."
"There is less computing power needed for scaling."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."
"I have found that the reporting feature in Zabbix is most valuable. Additionally, the solution has given us bandwidth options, we are able to see where problems are. For example, we noticed a problem that occurred because of a bad interface going in the wireless VLAN."
"Zabbix is very easy to implement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Based on my experience, there should be options for using the latest communication methods, like social media integration. Telegram is already integrated, but SMS and other alert options would be beneficial. So, integrating social media notifications into NetXMS would be a good thing."
"It could be more stable."
"The event correlation could be better."
"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."
"Zabbix could improve when it comes to large-scale use cases. Additionally, the inventory could be better when connecting to other solutions, such as ServiceNow. There show to be better integration with other platforms and storage."
"One of the things we don't like is that Zabbix has a license structure with a price that is high compared to the competition. It's very high, for example, compared to something like Microsoft Teams."
"If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice."
"The user interface could be a bit better. They could update it a bit."
"We would like to monitor other touchpoints such as ATM machines. It would be great if it can provide monitoring of ATM machines. Compatibility with other products would also be great."
NetXMS is ranked 44th in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 100 reviews. NetXMS is rated 10.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetXMS writes "Offers custom monitoring functionality, user-friendly interface, custom maps feature and open source". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". NetXMS is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.