We performed a comparison between OpenText Connected MX and Sophos SafeGuard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Mobile Data Protection."The integration features are the most valuable. The integration is specific to each solution. It works well with SQL and Oracle databases and so on."
"The solution has done a fabulous job of protecting us from threats."
"It's a straightforward solution."
"The product is easy to use."
"It's quite easy to integrate Safeguard with BitLocker"
"Sophos SafeGuard is very easy to implement, and the connection for remote users is beneficial."
"I like its ease of use the most. The management console is really nice. I like having one pane of glass that does everything. It does the Sophos anti-virus and encryption. Everything that you need is in one place. It is easy to use, and it is also pretty fast. It provides some pretty good details, and it lets you know who has access to a file. You can also add additional people to the encrypted documents, which is pretty good. Its stability and performance are also very good."
"The monitoring features are easy to use."
"Policy deployment is easy and quick to do."
"On the exchange server, you do not have the best options for adjusting your mailbox. This feature is not included. Also, disaster recovery backups can be improved. Some other solutions, such as HP Data Protector, have more features."
"Sometimes, when the product has a firmware upgrade, we encounter implementation problems, which can delay the connection and require a reset and reinstallation. It has been a persistent issue with Sophos SafeGuard."
"It just needs a little bit more on the reporting side. Its reporting can be improved a little bit in terms of being able to know that things are in the right status. I should be able to pull a report to make sure that everything is all right. It could also have cloud integration. At the time I was using it, it wasn't a cloud product."
"It would be ideal if the solution had different features within one agent."
"The integration could be a little better."
"Sometimes, multiple updates and crashes happen in the tool, making it an area where improvements are required."
"SafeGuard's user interface is ugly and doesn't provide reports, so we have to go into the database and get information from there by creating queries."
"The dashboards lack sufficient information."
"There's no centralized management. This is a drawback."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Connected MX is ranked 9th in Mobile Data Protection while Sophos SafeGuard is ranked 2nd in Mobile Data Protection with 38 reviews. OpenText Connected MX is rated 10.0, while Sophos SafeGuard is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Connected MX writes "The primary function of it is to back it up off-site so that if you ever have any kind of data corruption, data loss, that you can easily recover that data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos SafeGuard writes "A stable and easy-to-install solution that runs in the background without disturbing the user". OpenText Connected MX is most compared with , whereas Sophos SafeGuard is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and ESET Endpoint Encryption.
See our list of best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Data Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
