We compared PagerDuty and Opsgenie based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
PagerDuty and Opsgenie both offer efficient incident management and alerting systems, seamless integrations with various tools, and valuable customer support. PagerDuty is praised for its comprehensive reporting and analytics, while Opsgenie stands out for its effective on-call scheduling and customizable automation processes. Users find both products to have positive return on investment, however, PagerDuty requires enhancements in incident management and customization options, while Opsgenie could benefit from optimizing user experience and functionality. Additionally, PagerDuty users find its pricing, setup cost, and licensing favorable, whereas Opsgenie users appreciate the competitive pricing and flexible licensing options. Overall, each product caters to different needs in incident management, customization, and pricing structures.
Features: PagerDuty's valuable features include efficient incident management, alerting capabilities, integrations, customization options, reporting, and customer support. Opsgenie focuses on incident management, alert notifications, integration with monitoring tools, scheduling, process automation, customization, easy interface, and flexibility.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for PagerDuty has been praised for being straightforward and hassle-free, making the initial onboarding process easier. On the other hand, Opsgenie is known for its minimal setup expenses, providing users with a cost-effective solution., PagerDuty and Opsgenie both provide positive ROI. PagerDuty focuses on improving team communication and troubleshooting capabilities, while Opsgenie streamlines processes and enhances collaboration within teams.
Room for Improvement: PagerDuty has room for improvement in areas such as mobile app interface, incident management effectiveness, customization options for notifications, integration process with other tools, on-call scheduling simplification, and reporting capabilities. Opsgenie could benefit from enhancements to optimize user experience and functionality.
Deployment and customer support: Comparing the user reviews, PagerDuty users had varying experiences with the duration required for deployment and setup, with some having separate timeframes for each. In contrast, Opsgenie users mentioned that deployment and setup often occurred within the same timeframe for them., PagerDuty's customer service receives praise for its helpful and knowledgeable support staff. Users appreciate the efficiency and effectiveness of their prompt response. Opsgenie's customer support is commended for its responsiveness and competence, ensuring reliable assistance.
The summary above is based on 26 interviews we conducted recently with PagerDuty and Opsgenie users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically create a ticket for the support team when there is an alert."
"The rotation and scheduling are beneficial."
"This is a scalable solution. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability."
"Opsgenie has been most valuable in managing our incident response. We use Opsgenie for on-call management of AWS services, and its integration with CloudWatch has been particularly beneficial. Opsgenie alerts us to anomalies in cloud services, not just incidents but also performance issues like delayed response times or execution errors. So, we will quickly know about the issue, and it allows us to take swift action. It has been very helpful to us."
"Opsgenie integrates with Atlassian and other web monitoring and incident management tools."
"We can rely on the product to organize our schedules. We don't have to think about who will be next on-call. The system already gives us the answer. We don't have to waste time organizing how people are going to be covering each of their rotations. There's also an override option. So, it's easy to reschedule or reorganize our schedules when someone goes on vacation or when someone is on sick leave."
"One of the features my team found valuable in Opsgenie is the alert. There's also the option to install an app on your phone, so even if you don't have any mobile reception, but you're still connected to WiFi, you still get the alerts via the app, not just via phone call or SMS. The combination of both options was very useful because sometimes you have data and you don't have coverage by mobile, or vice versa. To have both options in terms of receiving alerts was very useful. Another valuable feature of Opsgenie is the on-call rotation with alerts. I belonged to a small team of three, then the team expanded into four members where everyone was on a weekly on-call basis, with each team member having a week of being on-call. At first, it was a bi-weekly on-call rotation, then it became once every three weeks, and after that, it was once every four weeks, so the on-call rotation with an alert feature was useful. My previous company had two separate environments, on the cloud and on-premises. My team was in charge of the on-premise environment, so there was a queue for my team with everything in Opsgenie, then the DevOps team had its queue on a group of infrastructure related to the cloud. Each team had its own devices organized in a group that was only managed per team. The on-call rotation was also separated between groups. Opsgenie is a very convenient solution for both teams in my previous company."
"Opsgenie has streamlined our communications and alerting."
"PagerDuty's notification process is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the phone app that allows us to send notifications without the additional fees when sending by SMS or phone calls."
"The most valuable features of PagerDuty are customization, access, policies, and different rules regarding the path of escalation. Additionally, it's easy to use and create overrides. For example, if you all are on a call for one week each, but somebody wants to go on PTO, the team needs to swap shifts in PagerDuty. This is easy to do by creating overrides to switch up the set schedules. It's very user-friendly in that aspect. It works well for monitoring and alerting."
"PagerDuty is very stable and very reliable."
"PagerDuty let us set up rosters based on our shifts. We could assign a hierarchy for how the calls should be escalated and the number of times the call will be transferred between people before it is answered. It makes it easy to access an agent via mobile phone."
"The SMS pages and the mobile application are pretty much the top two features."
"PagerDuty's best features are the dedicated application that allows me to reach my engineers immediately and the ability to directly assign specific tasks to individuals and have them report back."
"It has scaled well for us."
"I would like to see a little bit more work in API key management in the Opsgenie UI. It's a bit difficult to manage sometimes. For example, in terms of management, you can either see all the keys or none of the keys. This is something for which I would like to have better granularity so that I could give some people access to some of the keys. It's something that I don't have today if I'm not mistaken."
"We are using the cloud version of Atlassian products now, but I think the Data Center version we used earlier was much more user-friendly. There are lots of limitations in the cloud version The add-on or features that work with the Data Center versions are not compatible with the cloud version."
"I would like to see improvements in reporting capabilities that could provide additional value."
"When I needed to add the fourth guy to the on-call rotation, I had trouble finding the option in Opsgenie where I can add the new user. It took me some time to figure out because it it was very small. You have a pencil icon that you need to click, but it was so small and in a place that wasn't so obvious, so this is an area for improvement in the solution. I couldn't find the icon myself and my manager had to show me where it is. Opsgenie needs to be more user-friendly, particularly when it comes to finding the "Add New Users" option in the on-call rotation feature. Other than that, the solution was very easy to use, and you can see both the open and closed alerts."
"Initially, Opsgenie had bidirectional integration with Jira Service Management, but that functionality has been scaled back. Previously, Opsgenie was adept at managing incidents within its ecosystem, offering seamless ticket transfers between Opsgenie and Jira Service Desk. I valued the ability to push tickets between the two platforms, addressing the need for widespread information accessibility, though it sometimes led to duplication. My suggestion would be to reintroduce complete ticket funneling between these systems to streamline operations."
"In a future release, we would like to receive alerts when a specific threshold is reached and to escalate the reason for that alert."
"The installation of other applications is difficult in Opsgenie. I would like to see more flexible reporting methodologies. Scalability and pricing also need to be improved."
"I would like to see reports that can provide us with integration with Jira or with another management solution, which I'm not sure Opsgenie provides. The integration is possible, however as Opsgenie reports is an area that needs to be addressed. An alert is received, and Opsgenie will immediately generate a ticket or card for that issue, track it, and provide a follow-up. Opsgenie will also track an issue's whole life cycle. This is something that I would like to see in Opsgenie."
"It’s quite hard to reach the support team."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The solution does not code all alerts correctly so sometimes you get false positives or multiple alerts for the same issue."
"There is room for improvement with the time schedule. The way the schedule currently works is you assign all the team members in one schedule and it automatically spreads them around throughout the schedule... It would be better to be able to edit the schedule and place my team members where I want, or at least to have that option in addition to the automatic process."
"PagerDuty should be integrated with other tools, so it can import the IT roster automatically. Our other rules continue to work once they're configured, but the roster must be added manually."
"I am not a direct end user of PagerDuty. It's hard to consider its shortcomings in that sense."
"The biggest area for improvement with PagerDuty is noise suppression. There have been a handful of incidents through our use of PagerDuty over the years where one incident may lead to 30 to 50 pages because you're monitoring all these different things, and each thing is an individual page. There should be the ability to set up paging tiers and group correlations between some of the different pages. That is something that would be really valuable. We should be able to say this one page may have a group or a tree of effective other pages that may tier off of it. So, if you see those pages independently, go ahead and alarm, but if you see this plus that, don't do that."
"PagerDuty's webhooks need some improvement."
Opsgenie is ranked 2nd in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 14 reviews while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is ranked 1st in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 35 reviews. Opsgenie is rated 8.0, while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Opsgenie writes "The price is competitive and it's easy to use and configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PagerDuty Operations Cloud writes "Effectively generates alerts for incidents, making it suitable for 24/7 monitoring of infrastructure". Opsgenie is most compared with Splunk On-Call, xMatters , Everbridge IT Alerting and BigPanda, whereas PagerDuty Operations Cloud is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Everbridge IT Alerting, Splunk On-Call and xMatters . See our Opsgenie vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud report.
See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.