We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and Oracle Essbase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is high availability."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Enterprise Manager are the data guide and online monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring because it's very useful for checking and troubleshooting compared with other products, like Nagios for example, that have some interaction with Oracle."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"Essbase is extremely stable and low-maintenance."
"It is very fast compared to other normal databases, like SQL and MySQL."
"It helps us fetch specific data sets per users' requirements."
"I have found the most valuable aspect is the user-friendly environment and current features."
"The solution can handle a large volume of data."
"It is highly efficient and easily scalable, particularly for handling large databases."
"Unlike relational, where you're linking together multiple tables, with Essbase, you basically define what the dimensions are beforehand, and you define the hierarchy, and then load the data. This allows you to do a pretty sophisticated analysis so that you can drill into it and slice and dice the data."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The product must improve its support team."
"The solution is not as simple as people say it is."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"We could use it but definitely with some effort we can streamline much better and sometimes some box here and there, like 13C you have to really wait, but there are great features. Just have to make sure it is a stable product."
"The tool is expensive."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"The reporting tool of Essbase needs improvement."
"It's an expensive product to use."
"I would like to see an integration with application performance management and a version control management tool."
"The initial setup is pretty complex."
"There is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness."
"The initial setup could be simplified."
"The ability to drive external reporting out for development could be improved."
"They should improve the solution's performance."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews while Oracle Essbase is ranked 10th in Database Development and Management with 12 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while Oracle Essbase is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Essbase writes " Handles a huge amount of data at a time and offers good processing speed". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas Oracle Essbase is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau and Oracle Analytics Cloud. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. Oracle Essbase report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.