Postman vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Postman Logo
12,264 views|9,916 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
SmartBear Logo
2,426 views|1,986 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Oct 24, 2022

We performed a comparison between Postman and ReadyAPI based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say their deployment is straightforward.
  • Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability, scalability, flexibility, and automation features.

    Postman users like the solution’s ease of use, reporting, and user interface. Reviewers say the version management could be simplified and that its collection management could be improved, along with its email reporting function.

    ReadyAPI users say the solution can create stress tests very quickly, provides a customized environment, and is one of the best solutions you can get across the globe for API, test automation, and API penetration testing. Reviewers mention, however, that its UI could be better.
  • Pricing: Postman is open source. Users of ReadyAPI consider its pricing to be fair.
  • Service and Support: Postman users have only needed to use the community support forum and online resources. Users of ReadyAPI are very satisfied with the support they receive.
  • ROI: Postman users do not mention an ROI. Users of ReadyAPI report a positive ROI.

Comparison Results: Postman only has a couple of solutions to automate API tests, whereas ReadyAPI can do both API testing and load testing. ReadyAPI users also report a positive ROI, while Postman users do not. For these reasons, ReadyAPI wins this comparison.

To learn more, read our detailed Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What is most valuable for me is that we can create and share collections between the team members.""The initial setup of this solution is straightforward. Postman can be used as an extension in Google Chrome for those who do not wish to install it directly. Deployment took an hour and a half.""The API testing features are valuable.""The solution is stable.""The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and user-friendly.""The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution.""Postman helps us to automate the API testing in the team.""It's easy to see different versions of responses."

More Postman Pros →

"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities.""The interface is user-friendly.""API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features.""It's a very simple solution to use.""Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours.""SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly.""The tool’s scalability is very good.""ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code."

More ReadyAPI Test Pros →

Cons
"We have previously used Tosca which allowed us to verify information using authentications. It would be useful if this was also possible using Postman. In a future release, Postman should connect to DB.""Postman could be improved by providing options for performance testing of APIs.""They should integrate the solution with one of the CRM solutions.""Version management could be simplified.""If they could implement auto-validations and assertions from SoapUI, that would be a very good feature.""The solution is quite complex partly because the UI needs simplification.""The performance needs to be improved.""The request encryption could be one thing on which they can work a little bit. If we don't want to expose our production data but we still want to test our APIs on the production data, there should be a way to do that. It is not only with Postman. I think no tool in the market is doing that right now."

More Postman Cons →

"I would like more documentation, training, tutorials, etc. Also, I don't particularly appreciate that I have to save everything. It takes up a lot of space on my laptop, but I have to install the WSDL again If I don't save it.""If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating.""Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better.""The UI should be improved.""It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there.""Could integrate the graphing module for load testing.""SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards.""Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

More ReadyAPI Test Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is free."
  • "We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."
  • "We are using the free version that is available."
  • "Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."
  • "The solution is open-source and free."
  • "I am using the free option."
  • "Postman is a free service."
  • "Unlike APIs, the solution does not require a license."
  • More Postman Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is not that bad."
  • "I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
  • "My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
  • "The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
  • "We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."
  • "SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."
  • "ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."
  • "It is free of charge."
  • More ReadyAPI Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share them… more »
    Top Answer:The product is easy to implement.
    Top Answer:The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.
    Top Answer:ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
    Top Answer:ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 17 in API Testing Tools
    Views
    12,264
    Comparisons
    9,916
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.1
    8th
    out of 17 in API Testing Tools
    Views
    2,426
    Comparisons
    1,986
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Apache JMeter logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Katalon Studio logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Apigee logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Parasoft SOAtest logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    SoapUI NG Pro
    Learn More
    Overview

    Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.

    For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
    Sample Customers
    PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
    Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Training & Coaching Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Logistics Company11%
    Outsourcing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Postman is ranked 1st in API Testing Tools with 52 reviews while ReadyAPI Test is ranked 8th in API Testing Tools with 31 reviews. Postman is rated 8.2, while ReadyAPI Test is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Postman writes "Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Test writes "You can achieve any complex task with this tool". Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Apigee and Parasoft SOAtest, whereas ReadyAPI Test is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, ReadyAPI, Tricentis Tosca and Apigee. See our Postman vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

    See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.