We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Email Protection and Trellix Collaboration Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A one-stop shop for email protection"
"The solution scales well."
"The solution offers very good flexibility. You can blacklist or whitelist with ease."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"Provides better control over emails, especially those sent via Office 365 on the cloud."
"The solution's technical support is good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are the performance from being on the cloud."
"The solution scales quite well."
"The auto-remediation feature is valuable."
"FireEye Email Security helps us prevent spam and phishing emails and all other business-compromised email attacks."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its simplicity. It's very user-friendly."
"The product protects my email."
"FireEye Email Security is easy to use."
"I like FireEye's filtering, spam digests, and its advanced threat review of email flow. It also has a broad range of riskware rules you can deploy."
"We can control this solution from the cloud and are able to access it from wherever we are."
"Some use cases haven't been dealt with yet."
"The solution's server console and cluster dashboard have been the same for four years so need to be upgraded."
"I would want better spear phishing protection in the essentials package."
"The price could be improved."
"Sometimes it detects false positives."
"The largest complaint that we hear from our customers is that there is no local support."
"The scalability can be improved, and the solution can be optimized."
"The solution could be improved with the addition of PLP and email encryption features."
"I would like the solution to be able to automatically quarantine the malicious emails before getting to the user's mailbox and continue with regular email operations. This could result in the user clicking the email before the purge operation is completed."
"The reporting aspect of the solution needs improvement."
"In general, our company should make the tool more robust to protect our systems."
"The spam detection feature could be better."
"I would like to see this solution become more flexible."
"If they want to be the primary or best solution, they need to have better email management features."
"Sometimes especially zero-day spam emails can be passed to the user's inbox."
"The solution needs better support."
More Trellix Collaboration Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 1st in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 46 reviews while Trellix Collaboration Security is ranked 9th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 13 reviews. Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 8.4, while Trellix Collaboration Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "A reasonably priced product that offers protection to emails, along with spam filters". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Collaboration Security writes "Has an easy implementation phase to deal with for users". Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Secure Email and Abnormal Security, whereas Trellix Collaboration Security is most compared with Cisco Secure Email, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Trend Micro Email Security and Fortinet FortiMail. See our Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Trellix Collaboration Security report.
See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.
We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.