We performed a comparison between Sauce Labs and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Testing subscription videos for on-demand software, making them better quality and bug free for our customers."
"Testing my app on cloud has really helped us with save time and resources to procure various hardware and software, and set those up."
"With Sauce Labs, we have a whole universe of devices: Galaxy, all the iPhones, and all the operating system versions. All our software developers are able to test on a multitude of different devices."
"It has a wide assortment of platforms."
"Supplying devices to a testing team of possibly close to one thousand testers and developers is a great undertaking but Sauce Labs has made this very easy and a welcomed solution."
"Maintaining many environments for test is a bear. These guys make it so easy with their CI integration that you can have tests going in after a few hours."
"The Failure Analysis feature is really important for us, one of the most important aspects. What is the root cause? Is it because we have a defect or is it that we have a test case that we need to fix or modify? The Failure Analysis is one of the main functionalities that I am exploring all the time in Sauce Labs... The Failure Analysis helps us to discover which test cases we need to work on."
"It helped to integrate our performance testing and UAT, which helped to deliver a bug free software for our customers."
"We use this solution for qualitative coding. We make use of the SonarLint plugin as well as the dashboard."
"Using SonarQube benefits us because we are able to avoid the inclusion of malware in our applications."
"The solution has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages."
"Improve the code coverage and evaluates the technical steps and percentage of code being resolved."
"It is a very good tool for analysis and security vulnerability checking."
"The product is simple."
"The stability is good."
"It provides you with many features, as it does with the premium model, but there are still extra features that can be purchased if needed."
"Sauce Labs' dashboard could be improved by adding more filters and allowing more customization options. There was one instance where the dashboard on the Sauce Labs UI didn't meet our requirements, so we had to use the Sauce Labs API to create some apps and dashboards on our own. The API endpoints could be a little more robust and customizable."
"Integration with Github, as well as several other similar tools, could be improved."
"The testing process is difficult. I need to prove the complete competency of the tool, and I am finding that challenging."
"Sauce Labs needs to be improved in the different platforms for farm testing, like iOS and Android farm testing and farm testing web browsers."
"If I had to speak of an area that could be improved it would probably have to be the speed of interaction with the devices. There is at times a considerable amount of lag while using some of the virtual and at times even physical device farm"
"The pricing model of Sauce Labs could be more flexible. Sauce Labs has just one price for the type of solution and a set number of devices. Other solutions have a fee for the base solution and an additional cost per device. If you're a smaller organization, you have to consider your needs. Some smaller companies still need to test various devices, so my advice is to start small and scale up as needed. We had initially planned to start big, but that would have been a big waste."
"Better and programmatic controls on request/response recordings and sharing with developers."
"Start execution time as each time a set of tests start, it will launch a new VM so it takes a bit of time."
"The product must improve security analysis."
"We have tens of millions of code to be analyzed and processed. There can be some performance degradation if we are applying Sonar Link to large code or code that is complex. When the code had to be analyzed is when we ran into the main issues. There were several routines involved to solve those performance issues but this process should be improved."
"When we have a thousand products published over it, we expect it to be more efficient in terms of serving requests from the browser."
"It would be better if SonarQube provided a good UI for external configuration."
"SonarQube could improve by adding automatic creation of tasks after scanning and more support for the Czech language."
"If I configure a project in SonarQube, it generates a token. When we're compiling our code with SonarQube, we have to provide the token for security reasons. If IP-based connectivity is established with the solution, the project should automatically be populated without providing any additional token. It will be easy to provide just the IP address. It currently supports this functionality, but it makes a different branch in the project dashboard. From the configuration and dashboard point of view, it should have some transformations. There can be dashboard integration so that we can configure the dashboard for different purposes."
"If the product could assist us with fixing issues by giving us more pointers then it would help to resolve more of the warnings without such a commitment in terms of time."
"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."
Sauce Labs is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 113 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 112 reviews. Sauce Labs is rated 8.8, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Robust documentation, helpful support representative, good licensing model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto, LambdaTest, Bitbar and Tricentis Tosca, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and GitHub Advanced Security.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.