We performed a comparison between Software AG ARIS Process Mining and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Mining solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"The best feature of UiPath Process Mining, compared to a process discovery tool or mining tool I forgot the name of, is that UiPath Process Mining supplies more details about your current workflow and how it influences the business, including what's the delay or roadblock. The other tool doesn't give you detailed information, so UiPath Process Mining has a significant advantage."
"You can build flows with this product."
"UiPath's communication interface looks good."
"I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten."
"The Orchestrator module is very effective because it allows me to schedule the jobs in a particular manner without interrupting any processes so that it can automatically handle it."
"It empowers employee decision-making. It helps them locate bottlenecks and remediate items."
"The solution has some quality and time assurances to improve our business."
"Its Artificial Intelligence dependencies are valuable."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"I would like to see better integration with the Azure and AWS machine learning platforms."
"Data crunching needs to be done by an analytics team and then imported."
"The dashboard could be improved by allowing customization and they could introduce a Mac version of the solution."
"The product has to be simplified because there are some facets that are just too complex. It's not easy for everyone to understand. You have to do training on ProcessGold and then you can use it."
"Document Understanding can read up to a certain amount of accuracy. While I understand that they have already started working to improve that accuracy right now, I think the accuracy is still only around 85-90%. I would call that our main problem with UiPath currently."
"What needs improvement in UiPath Process Mining is manual delay support. For example, I have a pending workflow, and I've not taken action in the last five or ten days, and because of this, the whole process gets delayed, but UiPath Process Mining doesn't provide any manual delay insights. It gives about seventy to seventy-five percent detail on end-to-end process delays, the scope of automation, or the gap, but not about the manual delay, so what would make the solution better is if it communicates manual delay information. Every business process relies on human activity, with either approval or review, so UiPath Process Mining should capture that area and provide a workflow or diagram that shows more details, such as the impact of the delay, the workflow time without the human delay, etc. That could be too difficult, but it's what I'm expecting as a customer. More automation in UiPath Process Mining would be great."
"I would like a few tutorials that explain step by step how to start, including a few tips for new users."
"When I used UiPath, there were no connectors to extract data from databases or data warehouses."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 7th in Process Mining with 6 reviews while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "A stable cloud-based solution that allows optimization in addition to process discovery and analysis". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ and ABBYY Timeline. See our Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs. UiPath Process Mining report.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.