We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and SAP Intelligent RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to capture data from documents with different formats."
"Time-saving with increased levels of accuracy."
"ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to extract content from documents. It is able to identify specific fields and special characters."
"Verification station is a really good feature. It allows part-owners to be able to take a look at what comes out of the tool after a document, such as an invoice, is run through ABBYY. It also allows them to update it if there are any mistakes. So, it kind of gives them a little more control over what goes through the system and lessens the errors."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"Verification Station is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY FlexiCapture is the accuracy of the general extractions."
"It is remarkably easy to configure and code, and it doesn't require an extensive technical background or coding expertise."
"Contextor is a good solution for a Citrix environment. It's the first with this tool. Other tools provide the same functionality, but not with the Citrix environment."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Contextor is that everyone is in one place in the program that I need."
"Most of the details are already in the help portal and SAP notes are available. It is well documented as part of the product support."
"The initial setup of SAP Contextor is easy."
"The standout features of SAP Intelligent RPA are its flexibility and integration capabilities."
"Scalability is fine. It is pretty nice."
"I think that technical support should help instead of developing a solution from scratch every time you reach out to them."
"In IRISXtract, we can have master data, and we can set the master data. There are more options for taking any data and comparing it with master data. For a project, they have a dump from SAP for validation. This feature is there in ABBYY, but it is not extensive like IRISXtract. ABBYY is capturing the data, but there are not a lot of options to validate the captured data. It would be helpful if there are more options for validating the captured data in ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"Machine learning needs to be improved."
"Not a ten because sometimes some documents have handwritten data. If this improved, I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"It could be more intuitive. It's huge and has many options, and that makes it difficult. You have to go to Google and search for documents and videos to try and understand how it works. Some tools or processes or some parts of the process should be intuitive to make it easier for the developers."
"The accuracy changes depending on the scenario so you need to test it before committing to this solution."
"This solution should have better integration with RPA solutions such as Blue Prism."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"I found that the SAP scripting of a program is easier than SAP Contextor."
"SAP Contextor could improve by automating some processes."
"There should be more of an error, like a proper error feature, in future releases. Sometimes, we don't understand why that automation is not learning what, like, where it is stuck, or what is the reason like, or what is the criteria we are missing to add. So a proper error message would be helpful."
"I would like to see a better capacity for unstructured data, for example, PDF, or text within images."
"One way SAP Intelligent RPA could improve is by integrating built-in DI services for document processing."
"The initial setup is of medium complexity. It is neither too hard nor too simple. You need some background in SAP and an understanding of it."
"For potential features or improvements, one aspect I would suggest enhancing is the flexibility of the extraction process."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while SAP Intelligent RPA is ranked 17th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while SAP Intelligent RPA is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Intelligent RPA writes "Enhanced streamlining and optimization of the business processes with reduced operational costs, improved data accuracy, and increased overall productivity". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas SAP Intelligent RPA is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism Cloud and Blue Prism. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. SAP Intelligent RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.