We performed a comparison between Accedian Skylight and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Accedian Skylight is highly appreciated for its intuitive interface, advanced analytics capabilities, and exceptional performance. Datadog stands out for its advantageous offerings like customizable dashboards, and extensive integration options. Accedian Skylight has potential for enhancement by including a localized cloud option in Vietnam, improving reporting capabilities, facilitating solution updates without requiring repurchases, offering competitive pricing for NetFlow connection, and enhancing the user interface. Datadog can improve usability, integration, monitoring of external websites, security features, customization flexibility, documentation, and ease of implementation.
Service and Support: Accedian Skylight's customer service is highly regarded for its quick and knowledgeable assistance. Datadog's customer service has received both positive and negative feedback, with some users appreciating their promptness and accessibility, while others have faced delays and unresolved problems.
Ease of Deployment: Accedian Skylight's initial setup can range from simple and well-documented to challenging for network novices. Datadog's setup is generally seen as easy, but some users found it slightly complex and involved multiple teams for adjustments.
ROI: Accedian Skylight has consistently demonstrated a favorable return on investment for more than a decade. Users have reported different experiences with Datadog's ROI. Some users appreciate the time-saving and reduced blindspots it offers, while others value its ability to quickly debug live sites and save on labor.
Pricing: Users have differing opinions on the setup cost of Datadog, with some finding it costly and others finding it reasonable in comparison to other options. Nonetheless, the pricing structure is perplexing and lacks proper documentation. On the other hand, Accedian Skylight's pricing is generally competitive, but since being acquired, the prices have risen significantly, posing difficulties in selling the product.
Comparison Results: Accedian Skylight is the preferred choice over Datadog. Users praise Accedian Skylight for its user-friendly interface, superior performance, helpful support, and detailed documentation for easy implementation.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"This solution has helped to improve the interaction between our network, datacenter, and application teams. I have used other tools, but this tool can pinpoint the root cause of my application or network issue in the majority of the cases. So, it helps different divisions or groups in the IT department to troubleshoot together and get an issue resolved. This tool helps a lot in our day-to-day networking application and IT operations."
"I think the analytics features are okay. My customer also likes the interface, the GUI, because it's easy to operate."
"What I like most about Accedian Skylight is that it's a UI application, so using it is easy. I also like that the support for Accedian Skylight is helpful."
"If [the problem] is something related to HTTP or VoIP, then I can have a quick look into the protocols, a process which gives me some good ideas..."
"The response times, with the performance, are really interesting too, where you can see the packet loss."
"The ability to measure performance end-to-end across the cloud data center allows us to take corrective action to keep our channels online."
"Capturing traffic [is very interesting]. Currently, with our configuration, we don't capture the payload of the packets, just the header. But when we want the body, the payload of the packets, we can do a PCAP, and then analyze it within Wireshark."
"For us, the most valuable feature is something called TWAMP that allows for real-time traffic in a way that is 10 times lighter than things like SolarWinds. It's in the sub-milliseconds of accuracy, and you can divide tasks so that you can literally see things like the tagging for Quality of Service. That had been incorrect with the carrier, but there was no way on this planet you'd be able to tell a carrier that they're wrong. I have dozens of scenarios where we found "No, that's not right," and got it resolved instantly."
"We have found that we're able to get in and out of troubleshooting issues much more rapidly, which in turn, of course, enables us to spend more time on our products."
"The solution's SaaS model is easy to manage and works well in single- or multi-cloud environments."
"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboards that are provided out of the box, as well as ones we were able to configure."
"Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features."
"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."
"Straightforward to integrate and automate."
"The performance of Datadog is good."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"For the PVX, they are in the process of getting the results to export to cloud and SaaS for analytics. They told me that this will happen later this year. Right now, for the most part, I create that data myself."
"Because of the policies in Vietnam, we cannot connect the system to the Accedian cloud. It would be good if Accedian could provide a local cloud. In the next release, I would like them to focus on improving and adding more reporting features. This will help the operations teams."
"There should be an option to update and upgrade the solution to the new version without having to re-buy it. I have clients switching to other solutions. The old solution is great, but if you change your license to a new one, you have to almost re-buy it completely."
"If you want a new version, you go to the website. The hardest part is finding the link, where is that .bin file? Sometimes it's pretty hidden in a document... it's hidden in the release notes or in another file somewhere. And it's usually not on the first page either."
"This solution is expensive compared to some others."
"It's a bit slow. When I execute a query, something general with a short timeframe that covers one month, for instance, and I do not specify the IP source or IP destination, it can take ages because it has to query the whole database."
"Some of the Skylight applications are a little newer, and they're still moving through initial revs. There are certain bugs, but nothing is insurmountable... It will just take a little bit of time for their user interface to get a little bit better."
"It needs the possibility to export data because it is not easy to see larger data sets, e.g., for one month. It would be interesting to export data into a PDF or dashboard to keep a history of the situation."
"It can have a more modernized pricing mechanism. We're actually working with them to figure out how to become more modular and have a better and more modernized pricing mechanism. The issue with Datadog is that you have to buy the whole suite of different products, and you kind of get stuck in the old utilization of 40% of their suite. Most organizations today break down between application development, networking, and security. Therefore, there should be a way to break down different modules into just app dev, infosec, networking, etc. Customers have various needs across their business lines, and sometimes, they're just not willing to have tools that they're not using 100%. AppDynamics is probably a little bit better in terms of being modular."
"Datadog is so feature-rich that it is often hard to onboard new folks and tough to decide where to invest time."
"At times, it can be hard to generate metrics out of logs."
"We'd like Datadog to make the log storage cheaper."
"We have contact with many customers that cover many areas, so we have cases where the infrastructure administration could be improved."
"Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server."
"I would love to see support for front-end and mobile applications. Right now, it is mostly all back-end stuff. Being able to do some integration with our front-end products would be awesome."
"We would really like to see more from the Service Catalog."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Accedian Skylight is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 23 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Accedian Skylight is rated 9.0, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Accedian Skylight writes "Highly scalable, responsive support, but lacking new features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Accedian Skylight is most compared with ThousandEyes, SolarWinds NPM, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, Dynatrace and Savision Live Maps, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability. See our Accedian Skylight vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.