We performed a comparison between Alfabet FastLane and LeanIX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."The solution has provided us with a view of the truth in terms of our application portfolio."
"Interfaces well with downstream systems of data."
"The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies."
"It offers neat visualization and referencing functionality while enabling the creation of landscape maps and showing the relationship between different applications."
"LeanIX has a great application information architecture."
"LeanIX has good usability and stability. This SaaS is intuitive, easy to use, and comes with a nice reporting feature."
"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."
"Among the most valuable features are the easy-to-use interface and the ability to get quick results... Many tools that I have seen are great for technical people and for giving technical and business information as well, but they're not as friendly and easy as LeanIX... It works well for both technical and business users. It provides a good combination, enabling you to quickly put valuable information in for both technical and non-technical people and derive results."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and the user experience. It's easy to map the fact sheets."
"The initial setup is challenging because it relies on information from different stakeholders."
"The solution needs to incorporate a data patch tool that moves within and irons data."
"The whole integration architecture view of interfaces/data exchange could be improved."
"The initial setup has room for improvement."
"They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them."
"Report generation could be more detailed. There are some shortcomings when creating reports. We can't create tag-based reports or go beyond basic technical reports."
"Does a poor job of being able to allocate detailed costings to components within the network."
"They're probably positioned pretty well. I hope that they would not focus that much on the business architecture, and they would focus more on the overall cloud strategy and how we can leverage multi-cloud and transition back and forth from other cloud providers. With a lot of current vendors, you get locked in with one cloud, and then you try to migrate to someone else, and it becomes very problematic. What they need to do is to look at the overall data strategy, and they probably need to amplify their data strategy, especially around multi-cloud."
"The solution uses Gartner's time-based framework for application rationalization. One more thing that you can consider is having some add-on frameworks for the same, not just Gartner."
Alfabet FastLane is ranked 17th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 1 review while LeanIX is ranked 1st in Enterprise Architecture Management with 16 reviews. Alfabet FastLane is rated 8.0, while LeanIX is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alfabet FastLane writes "A clear view for managing portfolio growth, governance, and cost drivers or containment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LeanIX writes "Streamlines the process of identifying apps nearing end-of-life or requiring retirement and facilitates informed decisions about app retention". Alfabet FastLane is most compared with Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management, whereas LeanIX is most compared with ServiceNow, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX, ADOIT and iServer.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.