Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Wrike comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Wrike Logo
4,220 views|2,974 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and Wrike based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. Wrike Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature."

More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pros →

"We can easily write down the tasks and reorganize them as well as have a progression index. Wrike offers several views including a kanban view and Gantt chart view.""We utilize time tracking and reports most often.""In our company, we heavily rely on Wrike. Wrike has helped in communication, managing all sorts of projects and tasks, and having a history of all our correspondence items.""The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds.""The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality.""Visibility and organization are the most valuable features of Wrike.""It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly.""This is a good tool for project progress tracking and sharing tasks with internal and external parties."

More Wrike Pros →

Cons
"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."

More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Cons →

"The response from the website is a little bit slow, and the tool is too expensive for a small team.""We faced an issue with the Wrike outlook add-on; it is only available for Microsoft Office 365, and not the on-premise version.""The product needs to send direct emails to customers updating the latest aspects since it is better to hear directly.""It would be great if they could develop more reporting.""We feel that the actual project reports and roll-ups could be a lot different. We are seeking something more for the dashboard. We would like a high-level dashboard that can be broken down into individual product roll-ups and tasks that are assigned. If you assign someone to a task, it assigns them all of the tasks under that. We want to be able to break those down so that a person doesn't have an 800 task list, for example. We want more separation with that and a higher-level dashboard experience.""On one side, it's very easy to create a task with text, but on the other side, it's not very well-formatted. Therefore, it's difficult to track specific data written in a task. We are making templates, but it's not enough to use a template to know the exact status of different tasks. One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person. This is what is really missing in Wrike as compared to other tools. We are looking to replace Wrike because we need support for workflow. Another issue with Wrike is that they bring a lot of versions of the tool, which it's not so easy. They bring new versions very frequently, and these versions look similar. For example, we are using robots to read the tasks in the tools, which is problematic with Wrike because it is changing very frequently.""Wrike needs to be more responsive to community requests for new features.""What annoys me with Wrike and things that I would like to improve is that you need to have a very organized workflow that everyone in the company follows, and only then will Wrike work."

More Wrike Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is expensive. There is a yearly licensing cost. There are no additional costs, only the standard license, and the cloud license."
  • More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."
  • "From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."
  • "Wrike is expensive."
  • "Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."
  • More Wrike Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The dashboard is the most valuable feature.
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive. There is a yearly licensing cost. There are no additional costs, only the standard license, and the cloud license.
    Top Answer:The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality.
    Top Answer:The response from the website is a little bit slow, and the tool is too expensive for a small team. We are a startup, and we have a small team. Wrike's price is almost $1,400, and even if I want to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    402
    Comparisons
    336
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    419
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    4,220
    Comparisons
    2,974
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    planningIT, alfabet planningIT, Alfabet IT Planning and Portfolio Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Software AG's Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Platform provides decision-makers with insight into the IT portfolio to make the right IT investment decisions and to plan how IT will support the business in the future.

    Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings. Challenges Wrike helps solve:

    • Data silos: Tasks, discussions and documents scattered across email, Skype, personal computers and spreadsheets
    • Poor visibility into work status
    • Missed deadlines and project failures

    Main benefits:

    • Accelerating project delivery by using a platform your team will actually use and love
    • Keeping all team members on the same page even across borders without lengthy status meetings, long email threads and spreadsheet updates
    • Big picture of project progress with real-time updates and cross-project reports and newsfeed
    • Real-time team collaboration with discussions, files attached to tasks, and a built-in document editor


    Why Wrike?

    • Wrike is a system your team will use. It helps them do their work, not just track it.
    • Wrike can be easily customized to your needs as each team can set up their own workflow.
    • Wrike scales as you grow, providing visibility and ease of use for teams of any size.
    Sample Customers
    FUJITSU, Coca Cola, ING, CreditSuisse, CosmosDirekt, GTA, Echo Entertainment Group, Electrolux, Cern
    Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government11%
    Insurance Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Religious Institution15%
    Marketing Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization81%
    Computer Software Company3%
    Financial Services Firm2%
    Manufacturing Company2%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise83%
    Large Enterprise10%
    Buyer's Guide
    Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. Wrike
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. Wrike and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is ranked 14th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews while Wrike is ranked 6th in Project Management Software with 58 reviews. Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is rated 7.6, while Wrike is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management writes "Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wrike writes "Convenient Tool for Project and Task Management, comes with extra features including Analytics and Reporting ". Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is most compared with ARIS BPA, LeanIX, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Alfabet FastLane and Jira, whereas Wrike is most compared with Asana, monday.com, Adobe Workfront, Trello and Jira. See our Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. Wrike report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.