Amazon API Gateway vs Layer7 API Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
25,876 views|22,679 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
6,737 views|4,931 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and Layer7 API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon API Gateway vs. Layer7 API Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This solution is useful for making new APIs.""It is easy to set up. It is also quick to deploy.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""t is easy for integrations if it is deployed in AWS Services.""The product is stable.""The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.""In terms of most valuable features, it would say that it is really easy to start working with it.""This solution gives you a unified way to have your API accessed."

More Amazon API Gateway Pros →

"Every API that we get from external or from internal goes through this layer first, and it should not be a bottleneck. That was the problem we had before. Now it's no longer a bottleneck. It's more like a throughput, this process is less than 10 milliseconds for any particular API.""The most valuable feature is that it enables me to present data in the format that the client wants to consume it. That client might be a visualization tool, that client might be a report, that client might be a customer's API requirements.""I appreciate Layer 7 API management for its comprehensive approach to the entire API lifecycle, including governance, management, and analytics.""They have got a very compelling platform that enables organizations to easily develop and roll out mobile applications.""We loved the portal part the most, which had monetization and showed how people were using the stuff. It is a good product as a whole and has a lot of microservices and granular features.""The out-of-the-box security features are useful. Right now, you can just right-click and drag and drop the assertions with the rate limit. That, as well as the x-amount surge protection, is built in so we can bring that in.""API Enhanced Portal 4.1 looks very promising. API Gateway policy manager for writing policies is excellent. It is the best in the industry for policy writing.""Initial setup is straightforward. It is simple and easy to do."

More Layer7 API Management Pros →

Cons
"Amazon API Gateway will wait for only 30 seconds to get a response from other services, such as the Lambda function.""There are certain restrictions that cannot be implemented without web access.""I believe better governance and monitoring features would be beneficial.""We would like to see more UI-based monitoring.""I am not completely satisfied with Technical Support.""It would be useful to have a more complete development environment for the developer, with different integrative capabilities to manage all the life cycles for the API. I think the full version formula for that is really useful. They should improve the development environment for easier integration.""It's hard to configure. There's a lot of options but it's very hard, it's very confusing.""Amazon API Gateway is not as complete as Apigee and needs to be improved by adding more features to become a more robust application."

More Amazon API Gateway Cons →

"feel like Apigee's API product is more interactive. You can drag and drop with those, but it's a little more difficult in Layer7. It's less user-friendly compared to that Apigee product.""The UI design could be improved in the next release.""On the monitoring side, we need a better way to monitor it. CA has not given a clear understanding of what external tools we can use to do this.""They need a workflow for the API Developer Portal, where the process only allows requests to go to the correct person.""I feel there is a lot to improve in terms of providing plug-and-play functionalities, as at the moment it requires a lot of coding in their specific language for implementing a medium-complexity use case.""The Portal lacks maturity. Since the move from Portal 3.x to 4.x, a lot of features were removed. It is slowly coming back. I can see a lot of changes are done in the "background" to decouple components and make it more flexible. Those changes are just not getting to the UI side quick enough.""The Policy Manager tool that is used to manage the solution is very heavy to use because it is based in Java. Sometimes it takes a long time to load. There could be some improvements to it. If they could make Policy Manager on a web page that would be a good alternative.""The developer portal needs to fully supported SOAP services (including WSDL publication with security), it would certainly push adoption for us."

More Layer7 API Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a pay-per-use service, where you only pay for what you use."
  • "Fees are volume-based."
  • "There are no licensing fees."
  • "I am satisfied with the price."
  • "There is an annual licensing cost to use Amazon API Gateway."
  • "Amazon API Gateway has various pricing plans, but I cannot give the exact cost, though I can say that it's expensive. On a scale of one to five, I'd rate the pricing for Amazon API Gateway as two, as the solution is one of the most expensive products in the market for API management."
  • "We use all open-source technology."
  • "Since it's a serverless solution, Amazon API Gateway is not so expensive."
  • More Amazon API Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "CA has great pricing for gateways, so negotiate with your sales team."
  • "If the CA pricing for API management would be a little lower, they would be able to cover a broader market."
  • "Purchase 4.0 now and wait until they flush out the 4.1 problems."
  • "It depends on your use case of course, how much you want to go with that, because it can get pricey and depends on the size of your company."
  • "Be aware of additional licenses for your warm standby. Ensure you get plenty of non-production licenses."
  • "Do not buy piecemeal."
  • "It's my manager who takes care of the pricing. But I keep on hearing that it's a little pricey, it's on the higher side. That is what he says."
  • "Pricing is competitive. CA is ready to offer attractive discounts."
  • More Layer7 API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring… more »
    Top Answer:I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including… more »
    Top Answer:If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support is good.
    Top Answer:Licenses are required to operate the product, but I don't know much about the validity periods attached to it.
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is not very straightforward, making it an area where improvements are required.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 66 in API Management
    Views
    25,876
    Comparisons
    22,679
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    449
    Rating
    8.5
    10th
    out of 66 in API Management
    Views
    6,737
    Comparisons
    4,931
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create an API that acts as a "front door" for applications to access data, business logic, or functionality from your back-end services, such as workloads running on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), code running on AWS Lambda, or any Web application.

    Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs. 

    It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic. 

    With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.

    Sample Customers
    Autodesk, Fox Digital Consumer Group, iFlix, UK Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Miovision, Olympusat, PhotoVogue, Royale International Group, Veracode
    1. IBM  2. Microsoft  3. Oracle  4. Salesforce  5. SAP  6. Cisco  7. Dell  8. HP  9. Adobe  10. VMware  11. Accenture  12. Capgemini  13. Deloitte  14. PwC  15. Ernst & Young  16. Infosys  17. TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)  18. Wipro  19. Cognizant  20. HCL Technologies  21. Tech Mahindra  22. Fujitsu  23. Hitachi  24. NEC  25. NTT Data  26. Ericsson  27. Nokia  28. Siemens  29. AT&T  30. Verizon  31. Vodafone  32. Orange
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Retailer20%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Insurance Company10%
    Retailer8%
    Computer Software Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon API Gateway vs. Layer7 API Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon API Gateway vs. Layer7 API Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while Layer7 API Management is ranked 10th in API Management with 109 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while Layer7 API Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Layer7 API Management writes "Has great drag-and-drop features and it requires minimal coding ". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas Layer7 API Management is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Microsoft Azure API Management and IBM API Connect. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. Layer7 API Management report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.