We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers a low footprint. We don't have to come up with a data center ourselves. We basically don't have to own any hardware. We just rent a slice of their platform and we have everything we need."
"The cloud storage based on S3 is one the most valuable services we have deployed since it allows us infinite scale in storage and extremely high durability."
"Setting up AWS was pretty easy. It was straightforward to set up, and it took us a year to develop and migrate our mobile banking solution to the AWS cloud. Our migration experience was quite positive."
"It is very easy to set up. It is also easy to use. It has a lot of services and integrations. We've been able to integrate whatever we need until now."
"It integrates well."
"The most valuable feature is the availability, as we work in different availability zones."
"The most valuable feature is that it is simple."
"It has a lot of new features that make our lives easier in terms of what we want it to do in the house."
"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."
"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."
"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."
"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."
"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."
"The pricing structure can be improved and made more straightforward."
"They should have a better big data stack."
"Amazon AWS is a very poor product for students. Microsoft Azure is a better solution."
"Identity and access management on AWS could be straightforward."
"Requires better integration with other cloud products."
"Price is an area with a shortcoming in the solution that has a scope for improvement"
"There's not much room for improvement but that being said, they can improve the overall process of the overall product features and backend."
"There is a feature called Kinesis, which has to do with image processing. There are a few artificial intelligence tools that Amazon AWS should improve on."
"Automation could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."
"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."
"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."
"They need to improve the core licensing model."
"The product is expensive."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Red Hat OpenShift writes "Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Azure Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with OpenShift and VMware Tanzu Application Service. See our Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.