We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Easy to upgrade, easy to expand storage and change your EC2 types."
"It's a flexible solution."
"Amazon AWS is user-friendly and intuitive."
"The storage is most valuable. The gateway and documentation are also quite good."
"This solution is a good option if you are looking for cloud-based storage. Using a cloud-based solution, it is not required to accommodate a full workload. You can start with a basic version and scale up as needed."
"It improves the speed for us to access vendors."
"I like the technical support."
"Amazon is a really good solution with high performance. They offer more connectors than some of their competitors, such as Microsoft Azure."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"Amazon AWS is a very poor product for students. Microsoft Azure is a better solution."
"AWS support could be better."
"The user interface (UI) needs improvement. Right now, it's not the best."
"The pricing could be a bit high at times. It's something they could improve upon."
"Some extensions are better than others."
"One of the problems that I have seen is that some of the products are not as mature as others."
"There is room for improvement in cost. Everyone complains about AWS being expensive. The initial cost starts small but can skyrocket unexpectedly."
"We like everything about the solution except for the general price."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
"The pricing can be better."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 13th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 9 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, Azure Stack, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). See our Amazon AWS vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.