We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and G-Core Labs CDN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is stable."
"It is an expensive product with valuable features."
"The AWS environment was very helpful in terms of integration."
"The speed and usability of the solution are valuable."
"The tool is highly available and reliable. It helps to access server applications easily. Integrating Amazon CloudFront with other AWS services was very easy, I would rate it eight out of ten."
"The product provides reduced latency and quicker site refreshes."
"Amazon CloudFront is a stable solution."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the availability of the websites."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"Uptime is always perfect."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"The tool must provide regional control."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The lack of seamless integration made the setup process more complex and required additional research to manage all the services properly."
"The product should be more intuitive."
"The solution can benefit from expanding its data center and server locations to multiple places for smoother content delivery with even lower latency. The latency we experience is sufficient for our needs, and we are doing well. However, if they expand their locations in the future, it could be a positive factor. Its competitors have multiple data and server locations."
"The UI could be more user-friendly."
"The product could support any network load balancer. At present, we can use only Amazon’s load balancer application."
"They could be expanding the number of locations available. It will help users easily access content."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 22 reviews while G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.2, while G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and KeyCDN, whereas G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare and Cloudflare DNS. See our Amazon CloudFront vs. G-Core Labs CDN report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
