Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,862 views|5,048 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
980 views|834 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Microsoft Azure Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution.""We use the solution for migration.""The solution is stable.""The product is easy to use.""The reliability of storage is the main benefit.""AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR).""The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is its ease of use.""It is a stable solution and serve our purposes""This solution is easy to use, and performance-wise it is better than others.""The solution is stable. It works fine for us.""With Microsoft Azure Object Storage, they are an open market.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage is flexible and has all the features we need.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure.""The best thing is it's on the cloud. It's easily accessible to everyone through a mobile device, tablet, or laptop. Secondly, it's secure. Like any URL shared will not work after a few hours. Only the person concerned who has that URL can use it within a few hours to download the document. After that, it expires. Thirdly, we all keep an archive. For example, if there are old documents, they are still stored over there. Another nice Azure feature is that they have the regional set up for that storage, and there's no downtime, and I'm grateful for that. We don't have to worry, because it's secure. If something goes down, they have other copies of it on a separate server, and it's accessible."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"A couple of times, we faced outage issues that caused us problems.""Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out.""The product needs to improve cloud security.""I would like to see the retrieval time reduced.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud.""Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved.""Amazon S3 Glacier could be more secure.""The learning curve is very high."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"The administration of the solution is not as easy as we would like it to be.""The setup process could always be a bit easier.""If we look at the different versions of that ADLS, it really does not have a hierarchical storage mechanism.""I have no complaints about Microsoft Azure Object Storage, but maybe its market size could be more extensive, and its backup speed enhanced.""The password retrieval process was very difficult.""Its user interface could be better.""The product is expensive.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a pretty expensive solution."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."
  • "For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
  • "The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
  • "Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed."
  • "We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support."
  • "The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."
  • "It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use."
  • More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3 Glacier's reporting system somewhat confusing compared to other hyperscalers in the… more »
    Top Answer:The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model. You need to pay for what you are consuming. It is not a complex model. It is not an expensive product. There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing… more »
    Top Answer:The product hangs sometimes. The password retrieval process was very difficult.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,862
    Comparisons
    5,048
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    980
    Comparisons
    834
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    375
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

    • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
    • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
    • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
    • Power big data analytics
    • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
    Sample Customers
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization30%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    University5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Logistics Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.