Apache Pulsar vs WSO2 Stream Processor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pulsar Logo
1,610 views|1,100 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 Logo
168 views|147 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Pulsar and WSO2 Stream Processor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics.
To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Christian Bonami
Use WSO2 Stream Processor?
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The solution operates as a classic message broker but also as a streaming platform.
Top Answer:The solution is open-source freeware.
Top Answer:Documentation is poor because much of it is in Chinese with no English translation.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
12th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
1,610
Comparisons
1,100
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
470
Rating
8.0
27th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
168
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Pulsar
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache Pulsar is a cloud-native, distributed messaging and streaming platform originally created at Yahoo! and now a top-level Apache Software Foundation project

WSO2 Stream Processor is an open source, cloud native and lightweight stream processing platform that understands streaming SQL queries in order to capture, analyze, process and act on events in real time. This facilitates real-time streaming analytics and streaming data integration. With the product’s powerful streaming SQL, simple deployment, and ability to adapt to changes rapidly, enterprises can go to market faster and achieve greater ROI. Unlike other offerings, it provides a simple two-node deployment for high availability and scales beyond with its distributed deployment to cater to extremely high workloads.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Transport for London
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise60%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Streaming Analytics
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: May 2024.
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache Pulsar is ranked 12th in Streaming Analytics with 1 review while WSO2 Stream Processor is ranked 27th in Streaming Analytics. Apache Pulsar is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Stream Processor is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apache Pulsar writes "The solution can mimic other APIs without changing a line of code". On the other hand, Apache Pulsar is most compared with Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming, Amazon Kinesis, Amazon MSK and Azure Stream Analytics, whereas WSO2 Stream Processor is most compared with Apache Flink.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.