Apache Spark vs Netezza Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,430 views|1,869 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
234 views|103 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Netezza Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Hadoop solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark vs. Netezza Analytics Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The main feature that we find valuable is that it is very fast.""Now, when we're tackling sentiment analysis using NLP technologies, we deal with unstructured data—customer chats, feedback on promotions or demos, and even media like images, audio, and video files. For processing such data, we rely on PySpark. Beneath the surface, Spark functions as a compute engine with in-memory processing capabilities, enhancing performance through features like broadcasting and caching. It's become a crucial tool, widely adopted by 90% of companies for a decade or more.""The product’s most valuable features are lazy evaluation and workload distribution.""I feel the streaming is its best feature.""The product's deployment phase is easy.""It provides a scalable machine learning library.""It is useful for handling large amounts of data. It is very useful for scientific purposes.""The distribution of tasks, like the seamless map-reduce functionality, is quite impressive."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the performance.""Data compression. It was relatively impressive. I think at some point we were getting 4:1 compression if not more.""It is a back end for our SSIS, MicroStrategy,, Tableau. All of these are connecting to get the data. To do so we are also using our analytics which is built on the data.""For me, as an end-user, everything that I do on the solution is simple, clear, and understandable.""The need for administration involvement is quite limited on the solution.""The performance of the solution is its most valuable feature. The solution is easy to administer as well. It's very user-friendly. On the technical side, the architecture is simple to understand and you don't need too many administrators to handle the solution.""Speed contributes to large capacity."

More Netezza Analytics Pros →

Cons
"Apache Spark could improve the connectors that it supports. There are a lot of open-source databases in the market. For example, cloud databases, such as Redshift, Snowflake, and Synapse. Apache Spark should have connectors present to connect to these databases. There are a lot of workarounds required to connect to those databases, but it should have inbuilt connectors.""The setup I worked on was really complex.""The product could improve the user interface and make it easier for new users.""I know there is always discussion about which language to write applications in and some people do love Scala. However, I don't like it.""When you first start using this solution, it is common to run into memory errors when you are dealing with large amounts of data.""It should support more programming languages.""Apache Spark's GUI and scalability could be improved.""There were some problems related to the product's compatibility with a few Python libraries."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"The most valuable features of this solution are robustness and support.""This product is being discontinued from IBM, and I would like to have some kind of upgrade available.""The solution could implement more reporting tools and networking utilities.""The hardware has a risk of failure. They need to improve this.""In-DB processing with SAS Analytics, since this is supposed to be an analytics server so the expectation is there.""The Analytics feature should be simplified.""I'm not sure of IBM's roadmap currently, as the solution is coming up on its end of life.""Administration of this product is too tough. It's very complex because of the tools which it's missing."

More Netezza Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Expensive to maintain compared to other solutions."
  • "For me, mainly, it reduces my costs. It's not only the appliance cost. There are also support costs and a maintenance costs. It does reduce the costs very drastically."
  • "The annual licensing fees are twenty-two percent of the product cost."
  • More Netezza Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:Here are some things to consider when migrating from Netezza to AWS Redshift A. Migrating your data from Netezza to Redshift may be done using methods such as: o Use a third-party tool to export… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,430
    Comparisons
    1,869
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    8.7
    11th
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    234
    Comparisons
    103
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    IBM Netezza Analytics is an embedded, purpose-built, advanced analytics platform that empowers analytic enterprises to meet and exceed their business demands. As features, it can predict with more accuracy, deliver predictions faster and respond rapidly to changes.
    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    A leading online advertising network
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Spark vs. Netezza Analytics
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark vs. Netezza Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while Netezza Analytics is ranked 11th in Hadoop. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Netezza Analytics is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netezza Analytics writes "ARULES() function is the fastest implementation of the associations algorithm (a priori or tree) I have worked with". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Netezza Analytics is most compared with Spark SQL and HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric. See our Apache Spark vs. Netezza Analytics report.

    See our list of best Hadoop vendors.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.