We performed a comparison between Apiiro and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."
"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."
"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."
"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."
"User management is a little bit clunky."
"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."
"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."
"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."
"Some of the descriptions were found to be missing or were not as elaborate as compared to other descriptions. Although, they could be found across various standard sources but it would save a lot of time for developers, if this was fixed."
Apiiro is ranked 21st in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 2 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 67 reviews. Apiiro is rated 8.6, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apiiro writes "A great secrets detection feature, good visibility, and integrates well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Apiiro is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode and SonarQube, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Apiiro vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, best API Security vendors, and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.