We performed a comparison between Appian and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The product's most valuable feature is the low code aspect of development. We can develop an end-to-end VPN solution using a single platform."
"Appian helps you do a lot of things. It's easy to configure and build an application platform, and it offers a lot of features that you find in an RPA solution. It's flexible so you can reuse it for a variety of use cases."
"The product has a very good mobile app."
"Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"It has created executable requirements and speeds up the SDLC process greatly."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"Native mobile capabilities or hybrid mobile app capabilities are very limited. Things like offline sync, offline storage, access to smartphone device features, etc. are not supported by the Appian platform yet."
"I would like to see more complete university tools. For example, with UiPath, I have had a good experience related to a free course in order to provide some users some different levels of knowledge. This extra training helps users not only use the solution but to develop further within the tool."
"It would be nice if you could create your own customized apps when the business needed them."
"What could be improved is more on the front end perspective, like the user interface and the mobile application aspect."
"Sometimes, clients expect us to implement ERP using Appian, which is very complicated. In such cases, I don't believe that Appian is a good tool for that."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Appian is ranked 6th in Rapid Application Development Software with 58 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Appian is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.