We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Securonix UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"The features I have found most valuable are it capabilities for behavioral analytics and anomaly detection."
"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."
"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."
"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
"I faced stability issues with Windows Operating System. The installed connectors hang if they remain idle for a long period of time."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."
"The area that needs improvement is reporting."
"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."
ArcSight Analytics is ranked 16th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 15 reviews while Securonix UEBA is ranked 14th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews. ArcSight Analytics is rated 7.0, while Securonix UEBA is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Analytics writes "It has improved our system and network policy monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Securonix UEBA writes "Inbuilt detection algorithms, attentive technical support, and reasonably priced". ArcSight Analytics is most compared with , whereas Securonix UEBA is most compared with IBM Security QRadar and Splunk User Behavior Analytics. See our ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
