We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN."The GUI offered by the product is good."
"I believe their Adaptive Radio Management (ARM) in its current form provides the best automated management of transmit power and channel. It does a really good job of managing proper design and wireless environment."
"Aruba makes use of "Direct Tunnel" as its best security feature."
"Once Aruba Wireless is set up and configured correctly, you just walk away. That's what we like about it. We have some devices that are six or seven years old, which is rare in the wireless world because everything changes so quickly, but in some banks and municipalities, it just keeps working."
"The product keeps up with leading-edge technology so we have dependability and scalability."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup and deployment."
"The solution's strong security mechanism and user-friendly web console are great."
"It enables quick deployment within all branches for the users."
"It is very handy to have a support number to call."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is fast and does the job."
"There are many valuable features of Cisco Meraki, including the switches, stacking, and layer 3 routing."
"We can deploy it and check in on our customers without having an on-site connection or an on-site infrastructure for elderly customers."
"I really love their cloud-based dashboard which allows me to see all my locations from one location."
"The management console is valuable."
"You can scale the solution easily."
"We'd like to have a bit more artificial intelligence incorporated into existing products."
"The solution currently has a Windows update problem."
"The only issues are the configuration problems that impact the stability of the solution."
"The solution has bugs. It really has bugs, and you have to wait until it happens, then you realize it."
"Technical support is important to me and I feel that it is something that can be improved."
"The integration, pricing, and configuration could always be improved upon."
"From the commercial-side the pricing side is fine but in other aspects, it could be lowered."
"The integration should be better."
"The integration options with third-party applications need enhancement."
"I would like to see Cisco Meraki improve the accessibility by region level here in Latin America."
"The licensing isn't very customer-centric. They may have improved it, but previously, if you forgot to pay on a certain day, your service would be shut off."
"The signal coverage radius could be extended."
"I would like to see them improve their support where an assigned engineer can take the case all the way to closure. Usually, you get a different engineer calling regarding the same ticket."
"They're great. If there's anything that they need to change, it is just simplifying the site to which you go to make changes on the admin side."
"Some of their first level support staff does not seem to be well-versed in the solution, so support for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN needs improvement."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless and Mist AI and Cloud.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.