Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Asana Logo
5,365 views|3,842 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Camunda Logo
10,618 views|6,345 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Asana and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Stable Kanban style tool for collaboration and task management. It runs smoothly and has a straightforward setup.""This solution is easier and faster to use compared to Jira. It's not very structured and you can add sub-tasks and issues easily.""What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility.""Asana has helped me (as an individual contributor) organize my daily work and given me a way to plan for longer term objectives.""It has helped our departments maintain visibility.""The ability to build subtasks and break things down off of our major tasks has been very valuable. It is very stable and extremely scalable. The initial setup is very simple.""It's an easy way to communicate.""It is pretty comprehensive when it comes to the different views that it gives you. It gives you a Gantt chart view, calendar view, board view, and list view. It is kind of helpful to have different types of views and see how it views your different tasks. I appreciate being able to do that. The biggest thing is that it is extremely user friendly. Asana is pretty intuitive. Someone who is not tech-savvy can kind of catch on quickly. It is better than other tools like Smartsheet. Some of the other tools like Microsoft Project and Excel are great tools, but you have to invest a lot of time to learn them, which is not the case with Asana."

More Asana Pros →

"The solution is good for data models.""The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it.""We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes.""It is an absolutely stable solution.""The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN.""It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.""The graphical interface is very beneficial.""Camunda is a scalable product."

More Camunda Pros →

Cons
"It's difficult to have short-term collaborations with external users because the operations team owns the final licenses, and I work for marketing.""Currently, there are only a few available options, but it would be helpful to have more control over the notifications received.""The documentation for integration could be improved. We require more information to facilitate the integrations.""Having a quick way to do video inside the platform or video communication could be very handy.""For large teams, scalability should be improved.""There could be some improvements in terms of how projects or day-to-day work is organized. One of the challenges when it comes to rolling out to an enterprise is the way the projects are organized. It has a kind of setup where you have different projects and tasks, but it is not as organized as Smartsheet when it comes to organizing projects or different teams. It can get really cluttered really fast. JIRA has another suite to submit the support tickets. It would be good if Asana could branch out to incorporate some kind of workflow. It is great for collaboration and recording work, but there isn't any workflow. It would be useful if they can map out a workflow of who approves what. This is kind of a big ask, and it is not geared towards that.""We'd like the capability to be able to set up weekly reminders.""We tried, but we haven't been successful with it. If people don't have the training, it is not easy to use. You need to make sure that the people are trained to use the system. They can provide more resources in the form of webcasts and videos that people can use to train themselves and understand how to use it."

More Asana Cons →

"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.""Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities.""It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success.""I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.""Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow.""I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."

More Camunda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget."
  • "Asana has two different types of structures: company vs workspace. Company is really best if all the users you plan to assign work to are all internal (have the same corporate domain in their user ID email address). Once one person signs up (even for a free account) with a corporate email address, Asana will automatically relate that person to that company, if it already exists. If you plan to use it for external collaboration as well as internal, then creating a workspace is a better approach."
  • "It has a free version."
  • "There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."
  • "Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "For what it brings to the table, I think Asana is fairly affordable. I would like to see the portfolio feature in our pricing plan, but other than that, it's definitely pretty good."
  • "We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."
  • "This solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Asana Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's user interface is very good.
    Top Answer:Currently, I'm using Asana for free. The solution's free version can be used for basic functions. When my colleagues start using it, I will contact Asana and find the most efficient plan for us.
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,365
    Comparisons
    3,842
    Reviews
    18
    Average Words per Review
    471
    Rating
    8.4
    2nd
    Views
    10,618
    Comparisons
    6,345
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    934
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Microsoft Project logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Wrike logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    monday.com logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Planview PPM Pro logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Asana is web-based software-as-a-service that helps teams coordinate and manage their work. It helps companies move faster by making sure everyone knows the team’s plan and process and who is doing what by when.

    Each user can create projects using a list, board, calendar, or timeline view. Within each project, users can add tasks, subtasks, sections, comments, attachments, start and due dates, and custom fields. Project and task followers get notifications on changes or comments on the project and/or task in their Inbox. Individual users can see all of the tasks they're responsible for across all of their projects in a view called My Tasks.

    Asana is available in English, French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    Sample Customers
    Uber, Vodaphone, NASA, Spotify, Lyft, Baggu, Udacity, Patreon, Flipboard, Dropbox, Intel, Samsung, Airbnb, SFMoma, Hubspot, Trivago
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Profit13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Legal Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization50%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise55%
    Large Enterprise31%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Management Software
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Extremely stable, user-friendly, and easy to navigate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project, Wrike, monday.com and Planview PPM Pro, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian.

    We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.