We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SAP Jam based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"The integration's very good. You still have integration with lots of third party products, and it's very good."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"It has a very intuitive user interface, which every user able to manage the basic functionality of a PC will be able to work with and produce quite satisfactory results."
"Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"The trial stages, the ability to connect it to Jira, and the ability to export in PDF are all good capabilities."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."
"There could be an option to collaborate with other users while editing the documents."
"Atlassian needs to provide the source editor or a built-in plugin."
"Some aspects of the drawing perspective could be improved. When we upgrade a design and make technical architecture drawings to publish, we still use Visio first and then copy and paste it. If this feature were available on Confluence, it would be a useful tool."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"The price could be improved. I have heard that certain adjustments would be made in 2024 and that it will then be more expensive, but I don't know the specifics."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"I would like to see the text editor upgraded from its current limited abilities."
"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while SAP Jam is ranked 7th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SAP Jam is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Jam writes "A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas SAP Jam is most compared with SharePoint, Yammer and Microsoft 365 Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
