We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."
"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"Very fast for query processing."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"They should add more analytics. Their documentation could also be improved so that I don't have to bother my co-workers and tech support so often."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"they need to interact more with customers. They need to explain the features, especially when there are new releases of Greenplum. I know just from information I've found that it has other features, it can be used to for analytics, for integration with Big Data, Hadoop. They need to focus on this part with the customer."
"The availability could be better."
"They need to enhance integration with other Big Data products... to integrate with Big Data platforms, and to open a bi-directional connection between Greenplum and Big Data."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 10th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, Apache Kafka and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
