We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It's allowing us to increase our overall volumes of data that we're working with, without actually increasing the overall amount of team that we need to monitor it."
"A good piece of software is like a good referee. If it's doing good, you don't notice it. That's the good thing about Automic. We don't even notice that it's there a lot of the time. It's a very, very stable product."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that we can control between a lot of operating systems and other products because we have a lot of old and new products in our environment. It helps us to control all of them together."
"You gain a lot of time and effort because you can automatize many things. Repetitive tasks costs us, so we can reduce them to zero effort and minimal costs by using the product."
"It is an easy product to use, and we use it for end-to-end process automation."
"The user interface is very simple and straightforward."
"As far as our schedules, if we have problems, we can create our own process in the automation, which is good."
"We are able to control and change our processes when necessary."
"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."
"The new user interface needs improvement. The previous version was good and stable. Now, we have to check the new one before using a web browser. It is not stable."
"Our users are used to the flatline of the UC4. When we introduced the AVI, they are not interested nor motivated to use it."
"We would like some advantages, which we had with the Java UI, with the automation engine."
"Today, we use a rich client for this product. In the future, or for the next release, they will be using a web interface. This web interface is not as scalable as the rich client for us. The web client is not 100 percent programmed as we need it."
"During installation, some database elective issues popped up. These took some time to fix, but after some back and forth communication, these issues were resolved."
"I would like to see features from "Prompt" sets in read Masks."
"Documentation is not great. It was previously much better."
"I would like to see more types of Calendars in the next release of this solution."
"The interface needs some improvements."
Earn 20 points
Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and SaltStack, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation and Stonebranch.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
