We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"The solution has been stable."
"To me, what's most valuable in AutoSys Workload Automation is its robustness and quickness. The tool can trigger jobs within a few milliseconds, and it can handle large volumes of jobs."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."
"Valuable features include configurations enforcement, compliance data gathering, and deployment of a standardized OS."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is patch management."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is the availability of being able to manage the Microsoft estate. It handles many areas, such as asset management and tracking."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is valuable in keeping our systems updated. We are able to send updates to all the systems. Additionally, the Intune integration is helpful."
"The most valuable feature of SCCM is the application distribution."
"Technical support was helpful and responsive."
"It does the job and meets our needs. With everybody working remotely these days, we are using this solution to deploy everything. The deployment of PCs is easy."
"The product is very stable compared to older versions."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."
"An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features."
"CA Workload Automation is not part of CA's strategic vision going forward."
"The deployment process is lengthy and should be quicker to complete."
"We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users."
"The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections."
"The ability to integrate MDM would be great."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"The configuration of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could be improved, it is a bit complicated."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.