We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"It is a fairly stable solution."
"The ability to create calendars, calendering for batch jobs to run on a scheduled frequency."
"It's very easy to work with. The learning curve is not that steep."
"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing."
"I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"It can scale."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 8th in Workload Automation with 41 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.