We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."
"Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"
"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."
"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."
"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."
"It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"Due to the infrastructure's size, the introduction they offer is very, very useful. It helps with an overall understanding of the product."
"It is a scalable solution. So far, my company has not faced any issues with the scalability part of the solution."
"I mostly use the top events, and look at how the execution is happening on the database; and monitoring the cluster level rates. I even look at the execution plan."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"The tried and tested services that Oracle provides is second to none."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."
"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."
"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."
"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."
"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The tool is expensive."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"RMAN tools need improvement."
"The product must improve its support team."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"Better mobile access would be useful."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
Earn 20 points
Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 36th in Server Monitoring while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases. See our Avada Software Infrared360 vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.