We performed a comparison between AWS Savings Plans and Azure Cost Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Savings Plans is we can discuss budgets briefly during our confirmation process since we are aware of our usual consumption patterns. Creating budgets in this regard would be beneficial, as it would allow us to consume only what we need, without including reserve instances that do not serve our purpose."
"Billing management is self-explanatory. There isn't a specific feature that stands out, but it's a fundamental aspect that needs to be present."
"The cost analysis and exportability are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Cost management is the console's most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"It has predictive analysis. It can forecast based on the costs associated with the particular architecture and how often they use it, estimating how much they'll spend."
"The features that I have found most valuable, are the trend analysis and the budgetary trigger."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it's extremely customizable. It makes it very flexible in terms of usage."
"The visibility of AWS Savings Plans could improve."
"In the future, it would be interesting if there could be a combination of Savings Plans and some Reserved Servers."
"Cost Management could always provide more details. The more information, the better. They just need to build on what they have now."
"It would be nice if they could introduce connections to other clouds. It would be good to connect to AWS and Oracle cloud."
"It would be beneficial if Azure Cost Management could automatically generate budget rules using AI insights, eliminating the need for manual configuration."
"It can be difficult to determine the cost associated with certain resources as it relies on a tagging progress. This means we need to drill down billing reports to highlight and fix missing tags."
"The solution could improve its APIs to access the customer application."
"The technical support could be improved."
"The response time of customer support can be improved."
"Be wary of unnecessary costs."
AWS Savings Plans is ranked 6th in Cloud Cost Management with 2 reviews while Azure Cost Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Cost Management with 41 reviews. AWS Savings Plans is rated 9.0, while Azure Cost Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Savings Plans writes "Low maintenance, scales well, and straightforward implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Cost Management writes "A good, but limited cost information solution with strong analytics but requiring more flexibility in its reporting functionality". AWS Savings Plans is most compared with Zesty, Cloudability and IBM Turbonomic, whereas Azure Cost Management is most compared with IBM Turbonomic, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, Cloudability, Zabbix and Datadog.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
