We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Huawei Cloud WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks."
"What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"I believe the most impressive features are integration and ease of use. The best part of AWS WAF is the cloud-native WAF integration. There aren't any hidden deployments or hidden infrastructure which we have to maintain to have AWS WAF. AWS maintains everything; all we have to do is click the button, and WAF will be activated. Any packet coming through the internet will be filtered through."
"The most valuable features are the geo-restriction denials and the web ACL."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good."
"The agility is great for us in terms of cloud services in general."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Cloud WAF is its ease of use."
"The setup is complicated."
"The solution should identify why it blocks particular websites."
"It would be better if AWS WAF were more flexible. For example, if you take a third-party WAF like Imperva, they maintain the rule set, and these rule sets are constantly updated. They push security insights or new rules into the firewall. However, when it comes to AWS, it has a standard set of rules, and only those sets of rules in the application firewalls trigger alerts, block, and manage traffic. Alternative WAFs have something like bot mitigation or bot control within the WAF, but you don't have such things in AWS WAF. I will say there could have been better bot mitigation plans, there could have been better dealer mitigation plans, and there could be better-updated rule sets for every security issue which arises in web applications. In the next release, I would like to see if AWS WAF could take on DDoS protection within itself rather than being in a stand-alone solution like AWS Shield. I would also like a solution like a bot mitigation."
"It would be good if the solution provided managed WAF services."
"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
"It will be helpful if the product recommends rules that we can implement."
"It would be good if the solution's feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Huawei Cloud WAF is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Huawei Cloud WAF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Cloud WAF writes "Easy to use, but its feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Huawei Cloud WAF is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.