We performed a comparison between Axcient x360Recover and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service."It's super stable. We really like it."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"As of today, I have to shut everything down and the entire resource has to be offline while I'm doing the recovery. So having the ability to kind of recover while running would be a great feature to have."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."
"I would like to see more security features."
Earn 20 points
Axcient x360Recover is ranked 10th in Disaster Recovery as a Service while Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews. Axcient x360Recover is rated 9.0, while Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Axcient x360Recover writes "State-of-the-art disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". Axcient x360Recover is most compared with , whereas Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.