We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is a managed Kubernetes, so much of the maintenance in the control plane is handled automatically by the cloud service provider."
"The product serves the purpose of helping streamline our company's application deployment and scaling processes."
"The tool is budget-friendly."
"Its support team resolves technical issues accurately."
"The most valuable features of AKS are scalability, deployability, and automation."
"The most valuable features of AKS are rollback updates, high availability, easy management, speedy execution and deployment."
"We find the container orchestration tool that this solution provides to be very valuable."
"Integration and automation are the best features of the solution."
"We've seen a reduction in resources devoted to vulnerability monitoring. Before PingSafe we spent a lot of time monitoring and fixing these issues. PingSafe enabled us to divert more resources to the production environment."
"PingSafe's integration is smooth. They are highly customer-oriented, and the integration went well for us."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"The most valuable aspects of PingSafe are its alerting system and the remediation guidance it provides."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"PingSafe provides email alerts and ranks issues based on severity, such as high, critical, etc., that help us prioritize issues."
"It can be tough to access the servers when onboarding."
"If any customer uses a traditional code, the code-level changes take a lot of time."
"I would like to see a graphical user interface."
"The product’s cost could be reduced."
"We would like to see the addition of a service report from the server for this solution, so that we can monitor the health of server operations."
"I would like to see the stability get more synchronized."
"This is a fairly expensive solution, which can make it prohibitive for smaller organizations."
"The solution should improve its UI and cost."
"It does not bring much threat intel from the outside world. All it does is scan. If it can also correlate things, it will be better."
"I used to work on AWS. At times, I would generate a normal bug in my system, and then I would check PingSafe. The alert used to come after about three and a half hours. It used to take that long to generate the alert about the vulnerability in my system. If a hacker attacks a system and PingSafe takes three to four hours to generate an alert, it will not be beneficial for the company. It would be helpful if we get the alert in five to ten minutes."
"The could improve their mean time to detect."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"The reporting works well, but sometimes the severity classifications are inaccurate. Sometimes, it flags an issue as high-impact, but it should be a lower severity."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"We had a glitch in PingSafe where it fed us false positives in the past."
"With Cloud Native Security, we can't selectively enable or disable alerts based on our specific use case."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 33 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 77 reviews. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher and Qualys VMDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security and AWS GuardDuty. See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
