We performed a comparison between Barracuda Message Archiver and Mimecast Mailbox Continuity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Archiving solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to use."
"The security is pretty good, and that's why we're going to upgrade to an even more advanced package. We used it when we had a power issue, and it works. It has been pretty reliable, and the support has been quite good."
"It has all the features required for distribution, such as the ability to mail."
"We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways."
"Mimecast has some good support services in place."
"The Large File Send feature comes in handy when you have to send fairly large attachments."
"The most valuable feature of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is real-time alerts."
"It's a little bit more expensive than the others."
"The user mailbox management is poor."
"The price of the solution is expensive. It can improve by reducing the price."
"Technical support has been slower than it was in the past, likely due to the pandemic."
"The solution is expensive in comparison to similar solutions."
"The interface and the documentation could be improved. They can also include some more training resources and content like video. While setting things up, I had to search for the information quite a bit. It took me time to find the correct way to do something. The information is there, but it is sort of all over the place. They can create a better help knowledge base or help portal. It retains your email for 45 days. They can maybe increase this duration."
"The interface isn't the best. How everything works on the back end is confusing."
Barracuda Message Archiver is ranked 5th in Email Archiving with 2 reviews while Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is ranked 4th in Email Archiving with 6 reviews. Barracuda Message Archiver is rated 7.6, while Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Message Archiver writes "Easy to use with helpful email backup and search capabilities, but it needs to support SIEM integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity writes "Provides peace of mind and expands well but needs a better interface". Barracuda Message Archiver is most compared with , whereas Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is most compared with . See our Barracuda Message Archiver vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity report.
See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.
We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.