We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus and Cynet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is highly stable."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"The product is easy to use."
"A good feature is how the solution packages varied information into a single dashboard that's readable and meets our needs."
"The product has valuable front-end features."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the reality graphical user interface."
"It is quite stable. I would rate the stability of the solution a nine out of ten."
"If some unusual activity happens on the network, such as I open administrator sessions in a short duration of an hour on many computers in the lab, it sends me an alert about my network saying that one user opened three, four, or five sessions in one hour. Similarly, if I try to play with the disk size on a computer, it will send me an alert, and it will also stop the operation."
"The visibility it gives is excellent."
"We are very satisfied with the level of performance we get."
"It's transparent, so it's not something where every user has to press a button to download or do the thing. It is centralized, in fact. Personally, I use Malwarebytes and other tools, which are fine for home use. Cynet is also relatively silent in terms of operation, except when it's required to act."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The solution is not stable."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The support needs improvement."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"The solution must improve its management features."
"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"The mobile version needs improvement."
"In future releases, I would like to see cloud security aspects included."
"Compliance reports need to improve."
"Automation could be improved, and orchestration could be added to the features."
"The reporting functionality in Cynet may not be as comprehensive or flexible as desired."
"Cynet fails to deploy the same technology in mobile devices."
"An administration feature will be useful for Cynet."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the usability of this product for new threats. Meaning, not everything which is new is properly seen by the product and not all the required actions are taken."
"We'd like something that makes it easier to manage specific points."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is ranked 54th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 5 reviews while Cynet is ranked 15th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 35 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is rated 8.0, while Cynet is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus writes "Easy to use, helps against advanced threats, and enhances the security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cynet writes "Provides memory protection, device control, and vulnerability management". Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is most compared with HP Wolf Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert and Arista NDR, whereas Cynet is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus vs. Cynet report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.