We performed a comparison between Bizagi and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Agility is most valuable because we can develop so much faster than other tools. We can make requirements, develop, and go out to production much faster. So, agility in the software cycle is most valuable."
"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."
"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"It can be useful as a tool to improve your communications and the control of your processes. For example, when you have to explain a process to seven or eight stakeholders who think differently as well as have different experiences in different functional departments, it is not easy. Sometimes you are using a lot of technical terms, and other times, you are dealing with management terminology. The visual representation helps you create a better alignment and understanding for different roles and stakeholders of your workforce."
"The ability to write our own code inside each activity is beneficial. Sometimes we need to create functionality that doesn't come out of the box, and this allows us to do that."
"I like that Bizagi is fully compatible with BPMN 2.0. It also eases the way in which we work with BPMN 2.0 itself, which is a comprehensive and rather complex notation standard."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"Can design apps quickly and can connect to any database."
"We get feedback on a real-time basis, which is actually very useful for us."
"It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes."
"We like that this solution allows us to fully define our test environments, and link them using different code. This means we can do different tests, but with one basic structure, and then export the data and use it in other platforms."
"The solution works great and is stable."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"It is very easy for us to implement. We have a Microsoft ecosystem, and this solution has many components for integration."
"They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"The product must make automation easier."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"It needs some better notation functionality."
"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."
"Technical support could be faster, and more accurate."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"You can't add too many filters onto anything you build, otherwise, it will be very slow and it will affect your performance."
"Microsoft is not cheap. The pricing could be lowered for their customers."
"The solution is evolving very fast and every month new features are introduced. Sometimes it's difficult to catch up with all the evolution that's happening. I had to focus on Power BI for a while and left PowerApps at the side for a couple of months and when I came back, it had changed its interface and moved components around."
"Most of my training for what I do has been by watching or learning in the community. There needs to be better training on either one of these."
"There is room for improvement in error handling and debugging."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
Bizagi is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA and Appian, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and ServiceNow Now Platform. See our Bizagi vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
