BizFlow vs Camunda comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BizFlow Logo
160 views|97 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Camunda Logo
32,793 views|19,869 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BizFlow and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed BizFlow vs. Camunda Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."

More BizFlow Pros →

"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.""Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers.""Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy.""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now.""We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation.""It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it.""The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."

More Camunda Pros →

Cons
"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."

More BizFlow Cons →

"The latency of API could be decreased.""If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet.""Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it.""An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old.""They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome.""The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.""The migration strategy needs to be improved.""In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."

More Camunda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license."
  • More BizFlow Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also… more »
    Top Answer:Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license. Whereas… more »
    Top Answer:Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of… more »
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    160
    Comparisons
    97
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    965
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    32,793
    Comparisons
    19,869
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    921
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Business process management & workflow automation software; designed to work with people and with existing systems.

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    Sample Customers
    The Immigration and Custom Enforcement, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Naval Special Warfare, Jardine Lloyd Thompson, Premier Pensions Management Ltd, Continental AG, Samsung Heavy Industries, Brazos Higher Education Service Corporation
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    BizFlow vs. Camunda
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BizFlow vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BizFlow is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. BizFlow is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BizFlow writes "Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BizFlow is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our BizFlow vs. Camunda report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.