Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Board International Logo
1,529 views|1,031 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Jedox Logo
1,060 views|794 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Board and Jedox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Board vs. Jedox Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The benefits are getting the data in one spot, the ability to report dynamically, and version control.""Now, we have only one version of the truth.""With the combination of 24/7 global support and their community, there was great customer service, tech support, and community support.""The flexibility and the user-experience are the most valuable features of the solution.""It allows people to quickly create dashboards with reports.""The ability to create a data model and have it in testing within a week is fantastic.""The ease of being able to get the data into BOARD is what makes it nice for people with a semi-IT background.""All staff can now see their relevant scorecards online."

More Board Pros →

"The EPM is the most valuable feature.""The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.""The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage.""We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions.""The solution is very versatile.""The ETL function simplifies many tasks.""The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool.""The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."

More Jedox Pros →

Cons
"What could be better is the manual... nowadays, most people use a web client, but on the Board manual website, a lot of the information is only about the Windows client. If they could update that, it would be helpful.""Some of our users are still using an MS Office add-in for Excel for certain calculations, and when they export from Board, some of the values, some of the totals and column names, are not coming through into Excel.""It needs more export to Excel functionality. Right now, we're having to build within the cloud-based platform, as well as build within the Excel add-in, because the export to Excel is somewhat ugly.""It would be nice to have more connectors for other data sources. BOARD is a great tool to become the single source of the truth. Making it easier to connect data sources for niche software tools will make it easier to keep everything in one place.""It would be huge in the future if BOARD offered a lot more graphs and presentations, and it was a lot easier to use.""I'd like to see a more passive report user for enterprise report writers that aren't particularly technical.""I would like to see better relationships with the partners.""One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals."

More Board Cons →

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there.""I don't find it particularly user-friendly.""There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself.""The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it.""Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement.""There is not much training for Jedox.""Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it.""From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

More Jedox Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Find a partner who will take responsibility for the implementation, and be available for support."
  • "​In terms of the pricing, it was reasonable. BOARD is not the lowest in the market, but it was reasonable for us."
  • "It is not the cheapest product on earth, but you get so much. It provides good value for money."
  • "The solution is quite expensive, if it is made cheaper then we can have more clients. I rate it four out of ten."
  • More Board Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."
  • "We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."
  • "Excellent value for money."
  • "The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."
  • "The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."
  • "Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."
  • More Jedox Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and… more »
    Top Answer:All the reports are prepared automatically.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, the data disappears from the product. We have had a few such cases. When I added my comments to the data, it disappeared. A technical specialist tried to restore it. It was not convenient… more »
    Top Answer:The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements.
    Top Answer:There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,529
    Comparisons
    1,031
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.3
    Views
    1,060
    Comparisons
    794
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    521
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    IBM Planning Analytics logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Microsoft Power BI logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Tableau logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Qlik Sense logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Jedox EPM
    Learn More
    Overview

    BOARD International - headquartered in Switzerland - is a leading global provider of software for improving business results through better decision making. By unifying Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management into a single product, BOARD enables companies to achieve a shared vision of their performance across the entire organization, and thus a single version of the truth.

    BOARD provides seamless solutions for • Reporting & Analysis • Budgeting, Planning & Forecasting • Profitability Modelling & Optimization • Simulation & What-if-Analysis • Scorecarding & Strategy Management • Financial Consolidation. Based on visual modelling, BOARD has enabled global companies to deploy BI and CPM applications without a single line of code in a fraction of the time and cost associated with traditional solutions.

    Integrated Corporate Performance Management software provides reliable data, insights, and guidance to everyone in your company. Jedox delivers it all: Self-service budgeting, planning, and forecasting combined with intuitive analytics and BI dashboards in one integrated software platform. Users across the enterprise in any department from Finance to Sales, HR, and Procurement create integrated plans and reports based on the same data model and business logic. Integrate financial planning and analysis with operational plans and reporting to optimize processes, boost data quality, and slash planning cycles throughout the organization.

    Sample Customers
    Coca-Cola, Puma, Desigual, Ricoh, KPMG, H&M, Groupe SEB
    BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government20%
    Healthcare Company20%
    Hospitality Company10%
    Pharma/Biotech Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Retailer11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Board vs. Jedox
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Board vs. Jedox and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Board is ranked 11th in Business Performance Management with 35 reviews while Jedox is ranked 4th in Business Performance Management with 13 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while Jedox is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jedox writes "Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, whereas Jedox is most compared with IBM Planning Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Anaplan and Qlik Sense. See our Board vs. Jedox report.

    See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

    We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.