Bonita vs ProcessMaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bonitasoft Logo
4,558 views|2,968 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
ProcessMaker Logo
750 views|496 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bonita and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried.""We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management.""One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform.""The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable.""The user interface is easy to use.""I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features.""I really enjoy using the workflow management.""Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."

More Bonita Pros →

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities.""Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

More ProcessMaker Pros →

Cons
"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated.""We are struggling a bit with integrations.""There is a considerable learning curve.""I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful.""The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution.""Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product.""The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve.""The main issue with Bonita is that the workspace crashes sometimes."

More Bonita Cons →

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly.""This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

More ProcessMaker Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."
  • "Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."
  • "I believe this is a very good financial choice."
  • "The Community Edition comes free of charge."
  • "We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."
  • "Licensing cost for the Enterprise edition comes out to be around 40,000 a year. There is also a Community edition, which is free. Some customers can go for the Community edition, but some of them require the Enterprise edition. Big companies go for the Enterprise edition, which comes with a lot of additional features such as a mobile app."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."
  • More Bonita Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:The user interface is easy to use.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    4,558
    Comparisons
    2,968
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    366
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    750
    Comparisons
    496
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Camunda logo
    Compared 58% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Bonita BPM
    ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

    ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

    Sample Customers
    With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.
    Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company20%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Educational Organization8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government10%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bonita vs. ProcessMaker
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 27 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Bonita is rated 8.2, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, Apache Airflow, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow and Appian. See our Bonita vs. ProcessMaker report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.