We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The best feature is the automation."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Mendix and AWS Step Functions, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
