We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"It has been a stable product."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The stability is good."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Documentation could be improved."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
