We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is very good."
"The initial setup of Cambium is straightforward."
"It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The product's scalability features are good."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"It is easy to deploy, and it is not that complicated. There are a lot of systems that are very complicated, and they require a special kind of training. Their response is also very slow, especially with the Chinese vendors, but with Cambium, we have not faced any issues. Everything is going well in terms of cooperation from Cambium. We are happy with them, their services, their cooperation, and their quick response. They are just amazing."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the size of the outdoor access points. It's great and you can disguise them quite well."
"The analytic solution is good and should be improving further."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"I made some comparisons with other competitors and I found that Ruckus was number one in regards to stability."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"The best feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN apart from its seamless roaming feature where you roam beautifully on the network is its analytics tool that gives you so much insight into your deployment, so it has become more of a business intelligence type of tool as well. I also like that Ruckus Networks, in terms of WiFi security issues on the WiFi protocols, is also the first company to give you notices of security issues, and also the first to provide patches for those issues. Ruckus Wireless WAN is very proactive and much, much faster than Cisco, Aruba, and Meraki."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"Its build quality is good and quite robust."
"The solution's price could be better."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The installation is difficult."
"There is no good technical support available for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"I would like to have a better built-in reporting feature."
"It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution."
"There could be more power supply for the radio features."
"I have been working with WiFi for more than 17 years. I am not able to convince customers because of the pricing of the solution. Otherwise, we could have sold lots of this tool to the customers."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"The GUI interface of Ruckus Wireless WAN could be more usable, especially the drag-and-drop feature."
"The solution's AI offering and pricing could be improved."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.