We performed a comparison between Camunda and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"It has an open BPM"
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 48th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.