We performed a comparison between Camunda and Studio Creatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"The product is stable."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"The pre-configured CRM functionalities regarding the accounts management and contact activities is very good. It's easy to develop workflows."
"The low-code tools and business process management that Creatio provides are useful for our internal processes. It is also very easy to use."
"The business process management is definitely the most valuable feature. What Creatio ended up doing with their software solution is giving you the power, in your own hands, in a way that is incredibly intuitive and well-structured."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"It enables automating tasks and provides self-service options, ultimately improving efficiency and customer satisfaction."
"It is a low-code platform, that is very intuitive."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its CRM functionality and the fact that it is a no-code solution"
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"Documentation can be improved."
"The way bpm's infrastructure works, you can only have one data source on a page. It has to be connected to the object and you're pretty much locked in at that point... If you want to connect anything other than what exists in that object to that object, you're going to have to create a completely new home for it in that object."
"I can have several types of contacts, customers, employees, partners, and so on, and I would like to have a different view for each type of contact in the list view. Currently, there is no way to configure this. This is something I would like Creatio to improve. In this time of COVID, it is very important that all such solutions improve omnichannel communications and omnichannel marketing. Companies need to communicate with customers by using not just the phone number and email but also by using social networks. All companies today need artificial intelligence, machine learning, the internet of things, and social communication."
"They can improve the business rules for defining the type and quantity of the business load. They already seem to be working on this improvement. Integration with the social networks will be very appreciated by the companies. It will be very useful for communication between the company and customers, that is, B to C relationships. Most of the customers or users have smartphones, and they use a lot of social networks. Companies need to stay connected with the customers. They have enabled integration with WhatsApp and Telegram in recent releases, which has been very useful."
"Creatio needs to stabilize their marketplace."
"The mobile version of the solution could be improved. It's hard to customize it."
"HRM is an area where Studio Creatio lacks and needs to improve."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
"The solution does not allow extensive customization of the UI. I would like to have much more control over the UI when I build a process. Currently on the UI where the fields are placed and the layout is set in place and you cannot change it. Your experience is going to be the same throughout whatever use case that you are building from customer to customer. You can not have much control over how it looks for each customer. This is an area where they can improve on."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Studio Creatio is ranked 26th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Studio Creatio is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Studio Creatio writes "Leveraging process automation and advanced tools for streamlined operations". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Studio Creatio is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, Mendix, Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Camunda vs. Studio Creatio report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
