We performed a comparison between Camunda and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"The flexibility is great."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Pega BPM. See our Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
