We performed a comparison between Caspio and Microsoft Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."Caspio was user-friendly compared to other solutions. As someone who doesn't know a lot about coding, I found it easy to create a web application on this platform."
"I know there have been a lot of improvements and a lot of new services lately. I'm really not aware of all of them."
"It is quick and easy to deploy. It is flexible, and we can deploy a resource anytime. We like and prefer the pay-as-you-go model."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The feature that we like best is integration with Active Directory."
"One advantage of using Azure is that clients can start with a low-cost entry in terms of hardware and scale as their business and user base grows. They don't need to allocate a large budget for infrastructure upfront."
"There are many different components such as SaaS, PaaS, and API so every month they are releasing a few hundred new features."
"The most valuable feature is the instant availability of resources."
"Provisioning a server is fast, taking only one or two minutes before it is ready."
"The visualization of the data pages could be improved. You have to a lot of tweaking to make the visualization stand out. It's basic, but there are a lot of options. So you really have to do a lot of customizing on that part. They could add some templates that are more attractive than the basic ones. It would be helpful if you could start with something that's already built rather than working on standard templates from scratch."
"The documentation can be outdated and is not as clear in Microsoft Azure as it is in AWS or Google."
"The permissions and controls in the product are not easy to use."
"For deploying multiple resources in a big number, such as in hundreds, we need a streamlined process and more user-friendly scrips. The scripts have to be more user-friendly, and they should also supply some standard templates to deploy multiple resources at a time. Currently, it is very easy to deploy a couple of resources, but if you want to deploy multiple resources, it becomes complex. The material that they provide for integration with an existing on-prem data center is complex. They have to make them user-friendly. The scripts related to resource management need to be simplified."
"Virtual networks might be improved by adding more rules for the validation of protocols and peripheral elements in security assurance."
"It would be advantageous if the dashboard had more clarity, in terms of the visibility that it provides."
"Microsoft Azure is not always a user-friendly solution. There are too many people who develop this solution. For the end-users, sometimes it's not really fun to use or simple to use. It could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"With Microsoft, our only concern is exchange rates because we're paying in dollars. It's very expensive for us because of the exchange rates. It would help if they partnered with someone locally so we can pay in our local currency."
Caspio is ranked 25th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review while Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews. Caspio is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Caspio writes "It's a good solution for those with limited coding experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". Caspio is most compared with Zoho Creator, Microsoft Power Apps, Knack and Oracle Application Express (APEX), whereas Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.