We performed a comparison between CData Connect Cloud and Denodo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The most valuable feature of CData Connect is the accuracy of the data."
"The ability to connect to a lot of different sources."
"Denodo is very stable."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the short time frame in which you can deliver and connect."
"Overall, the product works quite well and has a good set of features."
"The performance and the speed to market are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The most valuable features of Denodo are the extraction option for adapters, and there are many things for the views, that are cached. Denodo is not storing the data, it looks first to tune the query, and these things are for the agents."
"Denodo is lightweight in terms of how it leads you to combine your discrete data systems at one spot."
"The most valuable feature is Data Catalogs."
"The amount of data that can be extracted at one point in time should be improved."
"I would like to see a connectivity option with third-party apps, for example, JDBC, and ODBC drivers. Currently, we need to install it separately from the Denodo side and then connect it."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"I would like to see a proper way to avoid killing the sourcing systems."
"I would like it if we could pull the data model or export the data model because Denodo has, based on how you build, something called associations. The data model gets very confusing when you go look at it. It depends on how you define it, but it's really huge. I wish there was a way to export it into Visio. It could be that they already have a way to do it, and I don't know, but it would be much easier for the architects and even for the developers to look at it than scrunching it into the screen and expanding every small portion of it. If there was an easy way to export the Denodo model into another modeling tool and view it, it would be great."
"Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like."
"The integration could use improvement, it's a lot of non-speed line processes that we have discovered, in the country. The configurations could use a lot more improvement."
"Tasks such as conversion of a date format or conversion of a number format that can be done in a very easy way in different languages, like SQL or Oracle, are not so easy to do in Denodo. For example, if you want to convert a date from one format to another, in Oracle it's pretty easy; in Denodo, however, it requires so many lines of code. Simple things that can be done very quickly in other database languages require more lines of code in Denodo."
"The support is not the best and should be improved."
Earn 20 points
CData Connect Cloud is ranked 29th in Cloud Data Integration while Denodo is ranked 8th in Cloud Data Integration with 29 reviews. CData Connect Cloud is rated 8.0, while Denodo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CData Connect Cloud writes "Accurate data and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". CData Connect Cloud is most compared with Oracle GoldenGate, SAP Data Services and Fivetran, whereas Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and Informatica PowerCenter.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Data Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.