We performed a comparison between Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it can be fully integrated with Microsoft solutions and it doesn't impact the productivity order."
"In terms of features, the querying is great."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"The pricing could be improved. It needs to be reduced."
"The customer service and support could improve their approach to questioning issues. They tend to ask questions one at a time, which creates a lot of back-and-forth communication."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
More Change Auditor for Windows File Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →
Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is ranked 55th in Log Management with 2 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management. Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is rated 9.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Change Auditor for Windows File Servers writes "Provides granular queries of security logs and real-time alerting helps me mitigate risks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". Change Auditor for Windows File Servers is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security and IBM Security QRadar, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.