Cisco Catalyst Switches vs ExtremeSwitching comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
10,596 views|5,320 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Extreme Logo
1,248 views|743 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Catalyst Switches and ExtremeSwitching based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Catalyst Switches vs. ExtremeSwitching Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"When it comes to Cisco Catalyst Switches, one can say that the legacy switches are stable.""Technical support is very helpful, even during implementation.""A good feature of Cisco Catalyst is that it records crash log files which can be used to literally identify the cause of a crash because there is a lot of information. And Cisco Catalyst supports the use of external flash disks for storing of images and file systems.""The warranty and continued firmware support are most valuable.""The scalability is excellent.""The product is reliable.""Power over Ethernet (PoE) is one of the most valuable features. It eliminates the need for power supplies every time.""I never had downtime with Cisco Catalyst Switches in the last eight years, and I'm pretty impressed with its reliability."

More Cisco Catalyst Switches Pros →

"Our vendors are great and they offer very good support services.""ExtremeSwitching is a good, stable platform.""The switches are fast.""The performance of ExtremeSwitching is good.""The unique ring topology is actually a handy innovation.""The solution can scale.""Performance is good.""The stability has been largely pretty good."

More ExtremeSwitching Pros →

Cons
"When you compare it with HPE and Aruba, it should be fancier.""The solution’s pricing and stability could be improved.""Pricing for this product is on the higher end, and is something that could be improved. Security could also be increased.""Facilitating and adapting the security updates would be a good improvement, because usually it requires to reboot the router to get them""The solution could improve security.""Cisco Catalyst Switches' pricing can be cheaper.""In terms of performance, Juniper switches have a more user-friendly interface and more features than Cisco switches.""Their centralized management could be better. There should be some kind of software for centralized management so that I don't need somebody else to manage it."

More Cisco Catalyst Switches Cons →

"I believe they should be more aggressive in terms of pricing.""It could be cheaper in general.""Their support could definitely be better.""There are latency issues that need to be addressed.""The solution lacks a cyber asset attack capability.""The pricing of the universal switches is an area of concern that needs to be improved.""ExtremeSwitching switches are not prevalent in the industry, so it's harder to go online and research how to deploy their APs or switches. There is a broader user community for Cisco and Juniper because they've been around for a while and everybody has a bit of knowledge they can publish online.""We noticed over the years that the price of the Extreme Switches has been rising and this will become a concern in the future."

More ExtremeSwitching Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​The price should go down instead of up. ​"
  • "It has a very high cost, but understandably, due to its very good quality."
  • "Cisco's prices are not cheap, but the stability is worth it."
  • "Pricing could be better."
  • "If you consider Cisco's price with the Dell, you will definitely lose with Cisco. But Cisco has a major area of equipment in general. Cisco has routers, firewalls, NAC, certain video conferencing, Apple phones, and different security solutions. But Dell doesn't have such areas, Dell only has switching architecture."
  • "Generally, Cisco Catalyst would be relatively expensive compared to the competition, it would be on the expensive side."
  • "Pricing is an issue I have been facing, in comparison with HPE or Juniper. The Nexus series is out of the question right now. Scalability is more an issue on the pricing side and less on the technology side."
  • "Catalyst is very expensive."
  • More Cisco Catalyst Switches Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "On pricing, ExtremeSwitches are going to beat most of the major competition."
  • "It is not a subscription-based model, and there is no licensing concept. We have to pay for hardware AMC. We have hardware on our premises and for the hardware support, we have to go for the annual maintenance contract with the partner."
  • "The pricing and licensing are good with the cloud."
  • "There is a cost for ExtremeSwitching and if you want the support and maintenance, there are additional costs. My clients typically pay for the support and maintenance annually."
  • "There is no license required to use the solution. The hardware controller is expensive, and this is why I prefer controlling ExtremeSwitching on the cloud."
  • "The price is expensive. We pay for a license, but you have to pay more if you want to increase the number."
  • "We paid 25,000 to 30,000 INR."
  • "ExtremeSwitching offers very good pricing plans for their licenses. Compared to their rivals, ExtremeSwitching's prices are very affordable and reasonable. This is why our customers are happy to pay for their service critical support. ExtremeSwitching also offers a great portal to track clients, further satisfying our customers. They are always happy to pay for the service every month. The pricing is very reasonable."
  • More ExtremeSwitching Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hello Mesfin It depends on the real scenario, the cisco 2960 is a very good device and they usually have routing functions but there are many different models within the same 2960 line, and on the… more »
    Top Answer:We are a vendor for the healthcare sector, especially hospitals, and normally, we use a full Cisco solution for stability, especially for the stability of the Access Points and the security of… more »
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a ten out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution excels in configuration and other aspects. It offers reliability and performance.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive because of its working nature.
    Top Answer:ExtremeSwitching hardware lacks flexibility compared to some other options.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    10,596
    Comparisons
    5,320
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    473
    Rating
    8.4
    7th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    1,248
    Comparisons
    743
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cisco Catalyst, Catalyst
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Catalyst Switches are a reliable and scalable network switching and routing solution, focusing on VLANs and VLAN switching. They are used as access switches, distribution switches, and core switches in various environments, deployed on-premises, and used for long connections. The switches are easy to configure, install, and upgrade and offer good pricing. 

    The most valuable features include warranty and firmware support, stability, security, good performance, flexibility, etc. The Cisco Catalyst Switches have provided a stable solution for the organizations and are widely used, trusted, and well-known in the networking industry.

    ExtremeSwitching is the family of products comprising different switch types: Modular (X8 and 8000 series [formerly BlackDiamond] and S and K series switches); Stackable (X-series and A, B, C, and 7100 series switches); Standalone (SSA, X430, and D, 200, 800, and ISW series); and Mobile Backhaul (E4G). ExtremeSwitching work from Edge Switching that ensures the performance and reliable operation of end-user devices and applications including port density, bandwidth, and network services to Aggregation / Core Switches is designed for the demanding needs of aggregation, top-of-rack and campus core environments, these switches deliver 10Gb, 40Gb and even 100Gb bandwidth with maximum throughput and reliability.
    Sample Customers
    Afni, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Del Papa Distributing, Explorer Pipeline, Mindtree, Omaha World Herald, Radio 538, Sony Corporation, Telecom Italia, Telenor Arena
    Blue Waters
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization54%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government4%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Government17%
    University17%
    Security Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Construction Company10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise30%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise32%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Catalyst Switches vs. ExtremeSwitching
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Catalyst Switches vs. ExtremeSwitching and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Catalyst Switches is ranked 1st in LAN Switching with 171 reviews while ExtremeSwitching is ranked 7th in LAN Switching with 18 reviews. Cisco Catalyst Switches is rated 8.6, while ExtremeSwitching is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Catalyst Switches writes "Reliable and stable catalyst switch; can be easily installed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ExtremeSwitching writes "Easy to configure, with a switching-level security feature". Cisco Catalyst Switches is most compared with Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches, Cisco Nexus, HPE ProCurve and Aruba Instant On Switches, whereas ExtremeSwitching is most compared with Cisco Nexus and NETGEAR Switches. See our Cisco Catalyst Switches vs. ExtremeSwitching report.

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors, best Data Center Networking vendors, and best AV Over IP Switching vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.